(Somewhere off Cozumel, Mexico) Market direction changes slowly.
Not a particularly brilliant first thought of the day after scanning half a zillion news sources, but it’s generally true.
Even though futures were down a tad when I looked earlier (-40 on the Dow) and the price of gold was weakening to under the $1,200 mark, none of that is particularly bothersome. Most of the reason is the Swiss franc is down because there’s light at the end of the Greek debt tunnel – at least that’s the idea over here.
With a tentative Greek bailout plan taking shape, Janet Yellen’s appearance in Washington to answer questions about possible Fed rate increase dates is expected to draw lots of attention. 10 AM (Eastern) so look for all kinds of punditry around that. Not that ijt will matter, but sometimes I think financial writers get p;aid by the word, not by the idea or interpretation.
There’s really not much of substance until Thursday when we will get the long-awaited (and did I mention late?) consumer price data. But in keeping with the “paid by the word” notion…
The couple of regional Fed reports out today are unlikely to convince anyone much of anything, but we will be putting up our usual two-parter tomorrow morning (no telling how long it will be delayed due to wireless at sea issues) when the Case-Shiller Housing data comes in,. That is a key number to watch.
Wednesday, Fedhead Janet speaks again, but by then we should be swimming in interpretations. Sometimes, it’s like testimony from a Fed Boss is a kind of Public Relations Dance. An idea about raising rates will likely be mentioned (as an in passing remark) tomorrow. Then, depending on how the financial channel clamor around it, the meaning of what she meant will be massaged around the next day.
Then comes the Big Day, Thursday morning, when we find out what the consumer prices have been. In keeping with our longer-term views, however, it’s really very simple: Food prices and rent have not been going down much, if any. Energy prices are bouncing around what could turn into an intermediate low, and whatever is left is what goes into consumer discretionary.
That leaves a ton of room for interpretation. Even with energy prices being weak, for example, I can still see how an exceptionally cold winter where some people will use twice as much energy as usual, might not be fully captured.
This is a fine area of distortion in price figures to think about:
If you usually put 500 gallons of oil in your home furnace to cover a winter at $4 a gallon, and this year you need to put in 1,000 gallons at $3.00, how would you report that?
An economist which is “Obama friendly” and singing the latest chorus of “Good Times are Just Ahead, Brother…” will inside that prices have fallen 25%.
Nice try.
As a practical matter, however, I would snap up the 500-gallon bill at $4-bucks a gallon ($2,000 annual heating cost) rather than the $3,000 annual heating cost.
Not to turn this morning into a “misleading statistics 101” class, but depending on who is writing the narrative (which used to be simply a story) really does have the upper hand.
Since Global Warming is (bad pun alert!) such a hot ticket in Washington, here lately, we have to start wondering if the home energy heating bills reflect a “standard winter” or the actual (ankle-grabbing) experience? Especially if you visit www.globalchange.gov.
I mean, let’s face it: Depending on how seriously you take Global Warming you could argue that the amount of oil to use in pricing really oughta be down around 490-gallon, just because it’s data and there is not U.S.