This morning’s column will take “some nerve” to read – because it is about precisely that – how our nerves operate.
The conventional wisdom is that all “thinking” happens in the head. Logically, this must be so because that’s where the nominal central processor for the body is located.
However, there are some simple sensory tricks that call this notion into question.
Think about your consciousness for a moment – that point of being within the body.
Now pick up any of our weapons of precision thinking. A hammer will do.
Give your thumb a fair – but not injuring whack!
As you do this, there are two ways of experiencing the event.
One is to remain brain-centered. In this case, your point of view is fixed (and quite painful, I would add) and your “out there in the body somewhere” pain is perceived.
The second and more problematic notion is that your consciousness is – for however brief a time – actually existing somewhere other than inside head, behind eyes.
This is the most important question in science right now: On the one hand, our “being-ness” is in a fixed location. Somewhere behind the eyes.
On the other hand, if our consciousness can flit around up and down nerves in the body – to extreme points of pain – such that we assemble reality there, instead of behind the eyes…well, that is a different kettle of fish completely.
The first instance argues that moving consciousness from its normal “seat” will be a brain-centered task. The second case, however, argues that it is merely an engineering problem to build the appropriate interface to the neural network.
And, if that trick can be done, then we are off to the stars because the main problem consciousness has is that as a semi-electrochemical function, which most seem to agree it is, the possibility of extending “its network” becomes a possibility.
Since I sacked out early Sunday night, and I’m going through a “brain on fire” moment, I thought I’d mention this as a fine thinking point to solve this week.
Obviously, if the second case is true (consciousness floats around inside of a traditional body) then it follows that at the moment of death we are able to “break-out” from the confines of the “container” (body) in which we live. This would put some hard science behind some reported human experiences; namely the soul being able to slip the confines of the body at the moment of death.
Whether the last-moment’s overdose of DMT is wholly a coping mechanism – and a drug-induced illusion of ego – is a matter being hotly debated.
On top of cabinets in operating rooms, there are cards and plaques with numbers, letters, and symbols that are not known to staff. Many of the people reporting near death experiences report seeing these scientific test markers accurately. And this, in turn, argues that there is something of a chemical jailer in place.
And it may be that our brains actual produce this “chemical jailer” stuff as a part of their regular function.
For a moment, think about those web-like Dream-Catchers that you can find at New Age and Indian curio shops, particularly in the West.
Odd as it may seem at first, is there a possibility that the role of humans is to act as a kind of “soul-catcher” whose function in the greater scheme of things is to act as a kind of incubator for the soul? Many religions would have it so. Many hand out concubines while others give away whole planets in the after-life.
While title to things non-owned is a questionable racket, it doesn’t move us from the central part of this morning’s ponder: Is there a non-drug way to build a physical extension of nerve tissue to get “out?”
I’m not sure how that would work…somehow in this life, I skipped the part where I study neurology and become an expert in this sort of thing.
However, it seems (intuitively) like there ought to be a way to “wire in” to neurons that are other than what we’re born with – and if that can be mastered, then we come up to exactly the point where immortality on this plane becomes possible.
Not that it would be easy. But huge progress looms in the Man-Machine-Interface area of research and development.
Let’s say that we could invent this new stuff that would “wire in” to a sufficiently large nerve in the body. And then, we would be able to break out, at least to some limited degree.
I’m sure you’re aware of all the work being done in “mental coupling” – which is exactly in this realm. On the input side, there are rudimentary “helmets” that use electrical impulses to couple to the brain.
One example of this was written up in 2013 when MIT’s work on artificial retinas was discussed in some depth here.
That was purely on the input side of the problem. Frankly, what amounts to perhaps a 60-pixel optical field may not seem like much, but it really is an incredible start.
On the output side of the problem, there is a ton of product on the verge of coming to market. Hongkiat has a list of “8 mind-blowing breakthroughs” over here.
The likely leader on the output side of things is a company called EMOTIV and their website is over here.
The key products to look at – in terms of where we go from simple Apps – will be thought-controlled computer commands. It looks like their Insight product is moving in that direction quickly.
Even more impressive is the fact that there are already Android apps coming out for the EMOTIV Insight like this one that promises:
FEATURES:
• Connect with an Insight headset via Bluetooth(r) SMART.
• Train 13 mental commands: Push, Pull, Move Left, Move Right, Lift, Drop, Rotate Left, Rotate Right, Rotate Clockwise, Rotate Counter Clockwise, Rotate Forward, Rotate Reverse and Disappear.
• Compatible with Android 4.4 and above.
It won’t be too long before the coping catches up and someone will come out with a thought-directed browsing system.
And after that?
Well, don’t look now, but if I was running DARPA, I would already be researching how to apply the Emotive Insight to flying of an aircraft. After all, coordinated light is not as difficult as the 13-commends which are already in the Android program. Flying an airplane by “thought control” comes purely a “mind-mapping” exercise.
To fly an airplane, you have three rudder inputs: left/right/none. Ailerons (roll) are the same thing – right, left, center. And then you’ve got three positions for elevator – up, down, and neutral.
Of course, each of these has to be proportional (and did I mention simultaneous?) but it’s not that hard.
Come to think of it, it has already been done in the Clint Eastwood move “Firefox” which came out back in 1982:
A joint Anglo-American plot is devised to steal a highly advanced Soviet fighter aircraft (MiG-31, NATO code name “Firefox”) which is capable of Mach 6, is invisible to radar, and carries weapons controlled by thought. Former United States Air Force Major Mitchell Gant (Eastwood), a Vietnam veteran and former POW, infiltrates the Soviet Union, aided by his ability to speak Russian (due to his having had a Russian mother) and a network of Jewish dissidents and sympathizers, three of whom are key scientists working on the fighter itself. His goal is to steal the Firefox and fly it back to friendly territory for analysis.
A number of products in this same arena are starting to pop onto Amazon. One such product is called Muse: The Brain Sensing Headband – Black and it will set you back $300 bucks. It promises some insight into the state of your brain (in terms of relaxed, level of cognitive function, whether you’re all worked up, hyper, brain-on-fire and that sort of thing. In which case, it will be very useful as a biofeedback machine.
At an even lower price-point is the NeuroSky MindWave Headset which runs $80 – but can be found with mobile options and software for (what else?) more money. This may be the first real “brain connector I buy because of its product description:
The MindWave headset takes decades of laboratory EEG technology research and puts it in your hands.
Read More