I have a new “conspiracy theory” to throw out there this morning.
It springs from an odd intersection of developments in life and specifically my weird dream the other morning about a problem with an electrical switch in a bathroom. We’ll get to that in a moment.
The main tool we’ll fire up this morning, however is our purely hypothetical Directorate 153 that we’ve used many times in the past in order to gain otherwise obscure insights into odd situations.
The theory behind Directorate 153 is that it is extremely likely that in the wake of the Cold War’s latter days, the U.S. Government had major incentives to install a “government continuity” operation that would be able to provide independent counsel (and action) to a President and or Congress in the aftermath of the unthinkable – global war.
Directorate 153 would be a ‘special-purpose tool’ – the kind of thing you only take out of the drawer when you need it – which hopefully is not more than once per decade, or so. And then, it is for only the most dire of circumstances.
The kind of dire circumstances?
Well, the most recent one that comes to mind is the 9-11 “terrorism” event.
In that event, the purely hypothetical use of Directorate 153 was to recruit the 19 Saudi Nationals who perpetrated the events of that dark day. Then, ensured that not only was it “pulled off” but that when things went wrong, key back-up personnel were in place to ensure that the desired illusion resulted, nevertheless.
So, for example, when passengers on the Pennsylvania crashed passenger jet stood up to the “hijackers” the result was that WTC-7 (widely discussed as the untouched tower that would have been this plane’s target) was then “pulled”.
Functionally, Directorate 153 would have had to count this as a huge victory: Not only was a major decline in global stock markets halted in its tracks, but in addition, government seized unimaginable powers in the form of the pre-conceived, pre-drafted “Patriot Act” and still enjoys those powers to this day.
You can see in this section of chart (which is updated in our bi-weekly Peoplenomics.com reports, how back in 2001, the market was fast-approaching a breakdown level in long-wave economic analysis where without 9/11 we would be in a huge Depression.
As past experience of Depressions informs us, massive economic displacements are dangerous to government continuity.
We have two “danger zones” where a super-computer powered “dark agency” moving only at times of maximum systemic stress to America’s foundations might be able to provide latitude for the president to operate in order to “save” the country.
The most interesting part of this is that the details and actual events seem to fit “theory” exceptionally well.
For example, this theory (of a dark agency) would conveniently explain why the U.S, never attacked Saudi Arabia, which was indeed home to the Wahhabi movement of Osama bin Laden fame. It would also explain why it took so long for bin Laden to be found and dispatched.
Moreover, it gave the Presidents and Congress necessary time to work with the Bankster class to “invent a new bubble” – the no-doc loans – that allowed the decline in the economy to be stopped short in 2002-2004 from thence which sprang arguably the biggest Housing Bubble in history.
A genuine conspiracist would then speculate that when we were, as a nation, at the bottom in 2009, something happened which turned things around. I have not figured out what cause the bottom to “be in” – it’s one of those infinitely debatable economic problems.
Of course, the conventional wisdom is that things had simply “run their course” but there was something else. It was almost as if for a short time America touched her roots for a moment and we collectively made a decision to move the country “Onward and Upward!”
Was that a subtle psychological change in atmospherics, or was it just “how the herd behaves”? It could be argued either way, I think with good points on either side.
Nevertheless, I believe there is much too high a level of congruence between operational policies of presidents Clinton, Bush, and Obama, to at least give some support to the idea that there is quite possibly a “continuity of government” shop, perhaps an arm of CIA, NSA, DIA, or maybe custodianship of the operation simply “floats” to make it more difficult for auditors to nail down.
As such, it could remain small, perhaps not more than 100 people, and each with a nebulous business card identifying them as “special agents” or representatives of this never-before discussed agency.
A few years back, I suggested that it could float around in Cabinet-level agencies, too. And if I were President, I’d probably park it somewhere like the Department of Agriculture where I’d dress it up as “food chain security” or other cover story. Sometimes the best place to hide things is in plain sight.
Would a sitting President ever be able to give the order to turn such an operation loose on America? That’s a difficult one.
Has Directorate 153 Been Used?
If this is such a “black ops” group, we know that it would have almost unfathomable computational horsepower.
There was a video I watched recently about how much can be known about how a person’s reactions reveal huge amounts of their inner “stuff.”
We have, in the last 20-years, into the world of augmented intelligence. A good historical perspective on this revolution in human-computer relations comes from Quid’s Sean Gourley. This is worth the 17-minutes of your time.
We can only imagine what the mood was like in the White House in mid 2001. The stock market is tanking and in comes the director of this (hypothetical) Directorate 153.
His briefing goes something like this:
“Mr. President: As you know our Directorate is charged with ensuring the long-term survival of these United States.
In order to accomplish this goal, we have developed the most advanced computer modeling capability in the world. And using it, we maintain an ongoing outlook for America’s future.
Right now, things do not look good, sir.
The stock market has peaked, and there is a collapse in the tech stock sector that we expect will remove $8-10 trillion dollars of wealth from this country in a best-case.
Unfortunately, sir, without your approval to implement a “special operation” we will likely see the following in the next five years: The tech stock collapse is only what we call a Wave 1 down event. We expect a very small Wave 2 sideways movement of the economy of the U.S.