When the markets go down 500-points in a day, you can sort of get the feeling that all is not well.
The natural thing to do – when they rally and cut the decline in half (this is all in a single day, mind you) is to rationalize “Gee, that wasn’t so bad, was it?”
The sad truth is that it is very bad – and a drop below the 1,740 level on the S&P is when we should all be under the bed sniffing the dust bunnies.
The reason is the vicious cycle problem. When things begin to go great, there is a “pile-on” effect that economists call the virtuous cycle. But when something begins to go wrong, as it is right now, we have to look at all the data and begin worrying in all earnestness about flipping from “virtuous” into “Vicious.”
A recent-experience example was the Housing Bubble. It began as an attempt by the government to kick-start our way out of the first starting point for the Greater Depression. That window happened in 2001 and was actioned by Osama bin Laden, who we seriously believe had the cooperation of at least some governmental elements, including quite possibly some shadow government types who have never been brought to justice.
Depressions are power progress-killers. And, if I were a member of a shadow government, I would have to admit that the events of 9/11 actually did some good.
The major good?
By fall of 2001, it was apparent that the tech bubble was finished. Depending on which estimates would believe, the total cost of the Tech Wreck was on the order of $5-trillion dollars, although some accounts mention half this amount.
9/11 did several key things, in terms of pulling economic levers.
First, it took the blame which should have been placed on the backs of greedy venture capital types and shifted it onto the persona of a “terrorist.”
Secondly, it gave the United States a “cause” to immediately wage a war…any war…and that took a lot of job-age males and kept them out of the labor force.
Third, it set up a massive new industry (the security state) which has taken on a life of its own. Well past the hiring of what is now estimated at 56,000+ direct jobs, but when we use the economic multiplier effect (all these people eat, for example, and some fraction will use daycare) an easy argument could be made that TSA alone is responsible for 134,000 jobs – and has been, come this fall, for 15-years.
Four, it provided for the evolution of the security state and Gen-4 warfare. Battlefield robotics are coming. There’s a million square feet up at Provo for sampling your data. And we even learned recently that the CIA spied on members of the U.S. Congress in the process of surveilling foreign political visitors.
Five, it continued to “de-focus” public attention from the definite replay elements of the previous economic collapse. You will recall that in the depths of the Great Depression, the government embarked on several wide-spread job creation programs. The most notable were the Works Progress Administration (WPA) and the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC).
I found it extremely interesting that the country laid the groundwork for massive civilian employment of young people with the Volunteers In Service To America (VISTA) program. The first batch of 20 VISTA workers were turned out in 1965.
That program was something the country “got right.” It had been a kind of article of faith that this Kondratieff fellow might be right about economic super-cycles, and an ideal 56-year harmonic off the Great Depression collapse was seen in 1987.
Good news on this front: The Fed managed to “paper-it-over.”
The bad news was that it was only a first-blush encounter with widespread collapse. It was a state-change event, as well. You will remember that long-term interest rates had peaked some six years earlier.
Despite the interventions, the systemic problems persisted and a major period of decline ensued in 1990-1991. The U.S. did what it does best – and off to war we went on this pretext of that.