Immediately after the Paris attacks, we raised a very pertinent question on the www.peoplenomics.com side of the house: Could terrorism become a business model? Are there unseen manipulators who are making a killing in all senses of the word?
I spent a good part of Wednesday afternoon and evening tied to a San Bernardino County sheriff’s scanner listening to the drama play out.
But already, we were keenly aware that this latest Islamic Outrage was sadly fitting a number of predictive markers.
To begin with, there is our “murder cycle” work that suggests mass killing sprees often happen in the 139-146 days period after a previous mass killing.
As soon as initial reports can in, I hopped on the computer and calculated that 145-days earlier would have been around the 10th of July.
According to the website www.shootingtracker.com, there were 19 murders in the US in this timeframe – the largest of which was the Chattanooga, TN shooting spree alleged to have been committed by Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez . This one resulted in 5 killed (including 4 U.S. Marines) and wounded 3 back on July 15th.
Moreover, this report from Business Insider noted that:
“According to Reuters and SITE, Abdulazeez blogged on Monday that “life is short and bitter” and Muslims should not miss an opportunity to “submit to Allah,” according to an organization that tracks extremist groups.”
In our work, we should expect another shooting outrage in the vicinity of April 16, 2016.
Returning to the immediate events, you’ll recall that I discussed with you last week how it was my opinion that as the number of undetected jihadists jumped over legal immigration requests by the Obama administration’s f/u’ed immigration schemes increased, as soon as America awareness on point began to increase, the shootings and attacks in the Homeland would increase because the invaders would have “nothing to lose.”
I hate being right about bad stuff for our beloved country.
Indeed, as predicted, in the aftermath this morning, we note that the Community Organizer in Chief is once again using this tragedy of San Bernardino as an excuse to attack legal gun ownership. Yet the weapons used were long guns and we note that Obama has never been able to utter the worlds “militant Muslim jihadists.” It’s a talk-around point and highly suspect.
If the Obama anti-gun people were more honest, they would note that strict gun control in France didn’t stop the mass killings there a few weeks back. According to Wikipedia, France is tough on guns:
The total number of firearms owned by an individual is also subject to limits (not possible to have more than 12 authorizations/permits on B1, B2 and B4 type firearms).[98] As of September, 2013, France has a capacity limit of 20 rounds for handguns;[99] one needs a permit for category one[clarification needed] semi-automatics that have a capacity greater than 3 rounds. Fully automatic firearms are illegal for civilian ownership.
As I have told you repeatedly: Gun control does not impact militant jihadists, drug cartels, or the evil criminal elements of this world. They simply don’t care about “laws” of infidels, Nortes, or fools. (If you think otherwise, put a checkmark next to the “fools” category for yourself.
But to the main points:
This morning, the futures are bouncing back (up 44 when I checked). But is it possible that within the jihadist community there are day traders? We wonder because if you KNEW in advance of an event such as yesterdays, would it have been possible to buy put options on the weekly S&P series, buy them the day before and then off;load them after a bump in price by late afternoon when the S&P was down 23 points and 1.1%?
It’s the same question we raised around the Paris shootings.; in that one, however, there were more bodies and an even larger market move in reaction.
At some point, those with foreknowledge of events could do very well trading – and making money for their antihuman and criminal enterprise. Cowering under the cover of being a “religion” the extremists – in our outlook – will now promote more attacks in the West.
It will serve to further restrict gun rights while at the same time getting the civilian population used to the idea of “no more freedoms.” We note that Belgium essentially lost ALL civil rights in the witch-hunt following Paris.
The next major move we can begin thinking about is whether James B.
Read More