Back in January, I did a Peoplenomics piece called “The Digital Anasazi,” looking at how once-great civilizations actually come apart. Not usually from one battle, one bad leader, or one bad economic number — but from too many stresses thrown into the blender at once. That is why today’s subscriber work updates the “news between” framework: oil, Taiwan, AI debt, drones, domestic unrest, heat, health surveillance, and the market ChartPack all looked at as one connected field, not separate little news boxes.
The public sees one headline at a time. History usually uses a blender. This morning’s PN walks through the current “Blink the Day” field, then moves into CPI and the ChartPack, where the market’s belief waves are looking a lot less cheerful than the financial shills would prefer.
More for Subscribers||| Master Index 2018 to Present ||| Master Index 2001 thru 2017 ||| Missing out? SUBSCRIBE NOW!!! |||
“The public sees one headline at a time”
Which presents a huge problem (and the one I have with your artificial news processors):
For at least the past hundred years (probably longer), when there’s a Republican in the White House, news has a heavy left bias. Under Trump the bias has been downright dishonest, with headlines and opening paragraphs being agenda-driven fabrications which contain no truth whatsoever. The writeup WILL present the truth, but not until the third-from-last paragraph. Unless the article is of personal interest to the reader, (s)he never gets to the truth, and is subtly programmed into thinking or believing the propaganda or “fake news” the Editor wishes to program into the heads of their readership.
Does your AI sift whole articles and separate the news from the propaganda, weighting the latter for the effect it has on low-intelligence readers but otherwise rejecting it? If not, it is presenting AN (Artificial News) by merely amplifying the propaganda.