If you believe Don Juan, in Carlo’s Castaneda’s books about the way of the nagual, you’ll not doubt be familiar with the concept of “petty demons.” And they’re not all bad, as oftentimes in spiritual pursuits, it’s the “petty demons” that offer much truth about ourselves.
Reader Bruce is one of mine. And he (more or less constantly) reminds me that Elaine and I could be hanging out in Ecuador, with a higher standard of living than what we enjoy in East Texas, should we elect the “exit” from the great ‘Merican Ponzi.
As is evident, I have no intention of fleeing America, although we do have second thoughts about this ‘Merica –place which has materialized – a kind of caricature of a Constitutional democratic republic – which presents itself daily as though suffering from some degenerative disease.
As such, each of us gets to watch reruns of House and then get up every morning with our diagnostician’s hat on, pick up the morning news, and try to get at the root causes of that which ails us.
To my way of thinking, that’s as it should be. My life has purpose, meaning, and so the Great Wheels of Progress turn.
But now and then extremely cogent and challenging emails float up from Ecuador which do provoke thought.
Like this one:
Subject Line: no, not tough questions, tough answers
George,
To put it bluntly, the part of you asking the question is not the part that can understand the answers.
In Western cultures, the onus is put upon a person (expert) to supposedly come up with the answers. In eastern schools of thought, the onus is on the questioner to understand the answer given. The true teacher is one who does not supply answers to someone who cannot understand. And one who does not give an answer if he does not know.
Tough questions, damn straight. And if you get any particularly keen insights that explain how this all works, send you answers of no more than 2,000 words, plus 25-cents in coin and two box tops to Crazy George at UrbanSurvival.com
This is the reason why when chela’s (defin. 2—g) would enter the ashram of a master they would be given months or years of mundane duties to in order to get their mind into a place where they were teachable. Here is the principle they are working with. This is so prevalent in western culture.
Noise Level
The other problem is terminology. In your WUJO post you are using lots of technical/computer technology. Much of this terminology did not exist 20 years ago, so there was no way to express these ideas in the english language, nor could we really even consider them as possibilities for describing reality until they came into the language. Ingo Swann, who developed the methods for teaching remote viewing, said that it was not possible to understand the principles and teach this until the word and concept of transducer came into the english language. It is also why, in his writings, Ingo would go to dictionaries and get ancient/original definitions of words and define them in his writings before using them. Its called creating a foundation upon which the information comes to rest so that it actually has value. Adapting the new information of a teaching to your paradigm will not give you what you are seeking. Its like building a dwelling on the ruins of an old without clearing the ground.
Now the problem with the language and terminology you are using today is that once the terms get into common parlance, there are multiple definitions, especially on the personal level. They cannot be used for teaching because they usually mean different things to different people, so you get different understandings when attempting to communicate this. This is why the Hindus will say that the true teaching cannot be transmitted verbally.