The big story of the morning is that the US intel supporting a strike on Iran is on the weak side. So now, the WH is considering the option of going to plan B – War Show Lite. The devil is always in the details…so here we go:
What could pending hostilities do to the price of oil – and hence gasoline? The CNBC piece over here addresses some of that.
The RT story out Thursday about how Iran is pondering the possibility of suing the US for the CIA-backed violent overthrow of its democratic government in the country way back in 1953 is being considered. It’s no secret that the US was behind the regime change there, and what most people don’t know (we weren’t old enough, eh?) was that the Shah of Iran (installed into that position by the US/West) was also a poster-boy for the the nuclear power lobby in the USA. Check out the graphic over here.
Not only has the US decided that only “authorized/friendly” governments will get to move ahead on nuclear power projects, but now we’re on the verge of a lightning strike on Syria, which – in case you’d forgotten – would remove a major ground defense operator from Israel’s path to an air strike on Iran.
Clearly, the administration would not be pleased with such an open affront to the US but that is what courts are for and if would certainly give the US public an opportunity to see what’s going on. Ooops…that awful word transparency comes to mind.
Meantime, the speculation this morning over whether the perps of the alleged nerve gas attack were the rebel forces, backed by the US and West, or was it the Assad government? continues unabated and unresolved. Articles like this one may be taken seriously, or not…
Still, if you look at the 3D theater model, you can see that a lightning strike on Damascus would provide a convenient distraction and an open window for the Israelis to zip over to Iran for a surgical strike on Iranian nuclear installations.
Impossible!! Well, not quite: As an indicator that this may be in the wings, we noted with interest the article in The Aviationist that “U.S. WC-135C nuclear radiation sniffing plane spotted over Europe. En-route to Syria?”
All of which might be understandable, except the Syrians aren’t believed to have nuclear weapons. So what nearby country, which could be overflown by Israel enroute to, say, the Iranian Bushehr nuclear complex? Such a strike could result in after-effects where the use of a WC-135C sniffer plane would be useful in order to reassure downwinders (like Russia) that it was just a “clean” surgical strike and “No harm done…” They hope…
It strikes a lot of readers, like this fellow Bill up in Idaho, that the US is acting a lot like a schoolyard bully:
Aho George,
The United States reminds me more and more of the schoolyard bully, that desperately wants to be looked up to and have friends, but thinks the way to do it is to beat the shit out of everyone. Makes me think also of the reality that if you keep poking someone in the chest because you are bigger and tougher….someday the recipient is going to get a 2X4 and even the score. The horrors of war seem to keep creating more whores of war. When will we ever learn.
No worries, Bill. the 2 by 4 would be an attack on the US homeland and that would do marvels for police state trends and justify the further destruction of the Constitution. Why, being in Idaho, I would have thought you’d have seen this.
But, in the meantime, you’re onto one thing: Faced with declining revenues, all levels of government are facing crisis in coming months and years because of the damned unstoppable effects of compound interest. And we need a scapegoat and Syria/Iran would be fine right up to lighting off a regional war.
A Note About War Costs
Whether we (as a nation) can afford to lob off a fleet of cruise missiles is certainly an issue. Seeing as we’re broke and maxed out on borrowing to the point we have to borrow from ourselves with QE Infinitum. As Steve Chapman notes in an OpEd this morning in the Chicago Trib, “Missile strikes won’t accomplish a thing…”
Obviously, although this is speculative on my part, I bet Steve Chapman’s retirement funds are not concentrated in holdings of large defense contractors like Raytheon, as they make the Tomahawks.