The other day – Tuesday being the other day in question – I had a little heart-to-heart with you about using a disciplined approach to bitcoins and how the use of charts, and Elliott Wave projections in particular – was a particularly good way to “bound” expectations about the future. It doesn’t always work, but it beats two tokes and a dart a lot of the time.
So here we are three trading days later and I think we can safely revise our thinking now because the two bullish cases being presented have warrants out for “failure to appears” to put it in legalese.
The two choices before us are the stasis/decline (lower) under which the price of bitcoins drops back down to the baseline price region. Or, under the Elliott thinking, the decline is turning into a third wave down and this morning’s data is just the start of The Bitcoin Uglies.
First the Good News: Under the stasis model (I was asleep when I drew the charts, so ignore the misspelling), the first outcome to consider is that the decline now underway will take bitcoins down to about the Wave 1 down low. The problem is? That’s going to vary, depending on which bitcoin clearing outfit you want to look at when you go quoting prices.
And there’s good debate here: Some coiners are likely to quote Mt. Gox but others will “go with the flow” [failing to notice that’s the flow of hype] and will use (for their purposes of citing the bullish case) to the highest prices quoted. Beware those who change data sources when they don’t like the numbers! That’s like quoting the Dow on the way up and the NASDAQ on the way down: Intellectual dishonesty is a bitch.
Unfortunately, coiners may simply be recreating how the (already corrupt) world of nominal/real currencies works: They ought to all be buying all the coins they can from Mt. Gox (where they are cheap) and then selling them for a good spread on higher priced coin clearing operations where the prices are higher.
Welcome to the world of intermarket arbitrage. Under this model, the Bitcoin price would have to fall to about $550 (bitstampUSD basis).
Except, (putting on my Lt. Columbo voice (you do own the series on DVD, right?) “Ders diss one ting dat bothers me, Sir…”
If bitcoins were going to stop at the $550 level, they ought to do it, more or less, across all bitcoin houses. And they haven’t stopped….which gets us to the next (and seemingly more likely) scenario:
Third waves are generally bigger than first waves. Under Elliott, the third wave must be at least as large as the first wave down which means, depending on which chart you look at, things could get worse – of far worse – depending on how much mental rigor you apply. And if you skipped your meds this morning.
OK, stopping at $550 is the extremely optimistic (under Elliott) decline scenario. Most often, however, the Wave 3 declines are in the area of 1.5 to 1.618 times Wave 1 down.
Two charts will help us range the outcome., These are both available at www.bitcoincharts.com./
The first chart to consider is the 6-month average price quote “bitstampUSD”. In this chart, it looks like Wave 1 down was from about $1,150 down to around $550. That’s a $600 dollar decline decline.
Given that the Wave 2 rally was up to $925, this suggests that a minimum $325 may be in the works.
However, remember that the more typical declines are in that 1.618 times area. So a 600 decline becomes (at 1.618 times Wave 1) a $970 decline.
And, given that the top of wave two was 925, this suggests that there’s a chance the value of crypto currencies (at least on some exchanges) could go to zero, since Wave 2’s high ($925) minus the possible decline ($970) leaves us a negative number which would mean the end of bitcoins.
Not that it would be unexpected.
Thus, within a month, or three, we might see reports of various bitcoin clearing operations going bankrupt or shutting down. Others may survive.
Ures truly has been consistently warning, in the face of much derision, that there are no barriers to entry into creating new digital currencies. In fact, when I read about Max Keiser’s plans for a “Max Coin” I laughed at some length and began to gin up an UrbanSurvival currency to be named in honor of my editor in chief Zeus the Cat. I was going to call ‘em ZeusCoins.
ZeusCoins would have as much inherent values as any other cryptocurrency, or maybe more, since instead of “making up “work”” to do on the internet, I was going to set up an International Dead Mouse Exchange (a take off on carbon credit trading) and make a shit-load more money than coiners. We even had a plan for dog owners to participate by buying rat terriers and sending them out to “mine” their local neighborhoods. Made as much sense as sending a PC to do stuff on the Internet, I figured. But I digress.
(Though I want to go on about the virtues of mouse tails, which can’t be copies with computers, and we were working with all the major 3D meat printer companies to ensure no one could scan and 3D print faux mouse tails as a hack. In fact, our anti-mouse tail scanning code is already deployed, so go ahead, try and 3D print a mousetail and I’m sure you’re find our micro encrypted serial numbers. Just like when you color scan a dollar bill. Seriously! [Or nearly so…])
Alt. Outcome: You need to go over to the Mt. Gox trading charts (thankyou again BitCoinCharts) and see how Mt. Gox overnight 6-month charts look and see how a recent quote on Bitcoins there was down to $378.5.
Again, lesson in Elliott basis the Mt. Gox data: High around $1,180 – high for Wave 1 up.
Then a decline to $580, or so for the bottom of Wave 1 down.
That ($1,180-$580) is our $600 decline.
Now, the Wave 2 high (the bounce) was up to about $1,050, call it.
So the expectation table would pencil out something like this:
100% of Wave 1 decline = $450. <— off the table, we blew through that]
150% of Wave 1 decline = $150 (a 50-50 chance of this?)
161.8% of Wave 1 decline = $79.50 (25% chance of this?)
The rest of the odds? Well, sometimes, declines go 2.5 or 2.618 times and even more rarely 3.5+ times the original price decline. In which case, we should be reading about our first digital currency collapse in short order (3-6 months, say).
Or, the $79.50 level might be reached (or the $150 level), concurrent with the announcement of a major bitcoin clearing operation declaring bankruptcy. In a way, this is really the preferred option, because it would leave the concept intact, sort of like Iraqi Dinars are still around waiting for the next run-up. ZeusCoins would be back on the table and MaxCoins might take over from Federal Reserve Notes, yet. But I’m not exactly holding my breath. Know why?
The guiding case for all this is the long wave economics study of Tulip Mania, which peaked in Holland in the 1630’s. Then, a single stinking tulip bulb was trading for the price of a home. Yeah, “How could people be so stupid?” you’re wondering…
Look around, dammit: See who’s in office? See the world we live in? Have you thought about treatment options?
Open Ure eyes, get a little more disciplined in your approach to reality; vape less, discipline the brain more, and let the numbers rule. They will, whether you agree, or not. There ain’t no bullshitting human nature…it’s the same now as it was in Holland back when. Ain’t no free lunch. There’s markets, there’s bubbles. Housing? Internet? Now Bitcoins….seeing a pattern?
It’ll be no comfort to me or my friends in coming weeks if our grim outlook for bitcoins comes to pass, but George Santayana said it best:
“Those who do not remember the past, are condemned to repeat it.”
Don’t be too hard on yourself, though. A tradesman in Tulipmania times made about 300 guilders per year. Prices of bulbs back then peaked well over 4,500 guilders – ten years wages for a working man.
That’s just how bubbles work. Pat, present, and future.
Global Warming Follow-Up
Reader Curtis is da man….has the right thinking on how to approach this global warming question:
Hey George, I’ve got an idea you might enjoy.
Read More