When one makes “predictions” about the future, the reader or analyst is faced with a terrible statistical problem.
While a perfect “hit” would be an event – exactly as described – there is the matter of “effective fulfillment” of a prediction.
When on pokes around the Internet, for example, and offers various insights into future events, there is often (accompanying) a kind of disclaimer. It says, in effect, that because the net is so large and impacting on mass consciousness, the ACTUAL fulfillment may not occur but a QUASI fulfillment would have to be counted.
When, for example, one writes about “massive flooding” to come, it is argued that “flooding” anywhere – even if just in headlines – would constitute fulfillment of a prediction.
But here’s the problem with that: Flooding goes on regularly (and worldwide) every year. So I can make a prediction of “flooding” and it’s bound to come true.
In eastern Europe, Serbia in particular at the moment, there is a worry that more flooding will come. No doubt, somewhere on the net – in various dream, prediction, and channeling sites – someone will in the past month have mentioned a prediction of “floods.”
Yet, here we are this morning, with flooding persisting in Serbia, and now it’s even threatening a power plant that serves about half the region’s electrical needs, says the NY Times.
Now comes the problem of whether “headlines” about a story qualify as fulfillment?
This is a long conversation that Chris McCleary at www.nationaldreamcenter.com and I will be having one of these days – as schedules permit – because we’re both finance guys (at least to the MBA level) and thus, both victims of statistics.
There’s no doubt that N (the number of data points) isn’t huge in any of this stuff, but the problem which we might call Anti-N is hard as hell to track for comparison purposes.
So yes, if you find 3 predictions and one of them “hits” it might look like a very good success rate.
Suppose, however, that the number of predictions was much higher – and you took into account the totality of all predictions – not just those having to do with floods. Then what?
CalQuake
This problem is far from theoretical. And I mention is this morning reference my “CalQuake” dream that I wrote up in yesterday’s column in (amazing, even for my iMax-like dream detail level).
Here the are on Monday and out comes the heading that says the SF Bay Area is due for a huge release of energy. But will it come as one mega quake, or will it be a series? The article “Bay Area’s future earthquakes: Knockout blow, or combination punch?” begins to ask the question and sketch out answers.
You see the problem, right?
The dream was of a much higher level of specificity and yet – by the very definition of some who make outrageous claims about predictive ability – my Monday morning post, followed some 10-hours later by huge headlines about involving exactly the area (the high tech hub) and earthquake risks, would have to be scored as a “hit.”
It’s an odd problem, for sure, but I’m not sure that the pseudo-hit is really legit.
Remember, in the case of the plane/emergency landing dream, we had a “near hit” within a day of the dream posting. Yet the actual (and rather precise “fill” didn’t happen for fully 10-days.
So while it’s interesting that the report came out, I’m skeptical, even though by past metrics I might have counted it as a hit.
Instead, I’m looking further out for a real big quake. And let’s toss in the report of more than 70,000 fish dying in Marine Del Rey. There are times when fish die-offs precede quakes.
About the only thing missing now would be a few dead oarfish this weekend off of Monterey and the stage would be perfectly set.
We shall see.,..but the problem of N and anti-N is a vexing one. And it gets to the core of discernment or mental “slop.” The poet in me says score it. The numbers guy says nope, not enough data because anti-N hasn’t been calculated.
Twofer Tuesday in the WoWW
A couple of dandy reports on the ongoing trouble with reality becoming Swiss-cheesy of late. Think of it as a Tuesday Twofer from the World of Woo-Woo (WoWW).
Remember a week or three back, we had a report about the woman who heard a mysterious female voice while taking a shower? Well, she’s got a friend, apparently:
Hi George!
I wrote a couple of weeks back about hearing a female voice requesting she come into my bathroom while I was in the shower – and no-one there, of course.
Well, last week while at home alone, I heard a male voice (not a basso, but a deeper-pitched voice), briefly say “Hi, I…” and the transmission was interrupted by traffic noise from outside.
Since then, my husband and I have been hearing loud bangs around the house, and when we investigate nothing seems to be out of place. In fact on Friday night after I had gone to bed (I was still awake) there was an outrageous bang and a the sound of the table leaf hitting the table outside the bedroom door.
I have four cats so I suspected their involvement, but, no sign of anything out of place or cats in contest. I said out loud “ For heaven’s sake, I’m tired and trying to sleep. Just cut it out!” and since then it’s been quiet. Guess I opened a portal when I invited the female in, but it has seemed to have settled down since Friday night.
Keep up the good work, love what you are doing!
Somewhere in here, you might want to be nailing crucifixes up over all the exterior doors of your house, call Dial-An-Exorcism, have the rugs cleaned with holy water, run a few censors of incense through the place with all the doors open while chanting “I renounce the devil and all his works and all his ways” and other commands to get out.