One of my liberal friends called me this week to announce that the NRA was requiring convention-goers to their national gathering up in Tennessee to remove firing pins from their guns before entering the show.

I had to just sit back and listen – since once wound up on gun control, I can invest hours I don’t have in listening to anti-gun propaganda.

But here we have it this morning, over at the Bearing Arms dot com site that no, the only firing pin removal that would be required would be from display guns.  You know, the kind anyone wandering the show could pick up, touch, test the action, weight, balance, and such on.

Otherwise, notes the article is it really big news that the N.R.A. expects its members to follow local laws – whatever those happen to be?

As a gun owner (and user) I have to point out that guns are – like any other tool invented by the crazy upright bipeds – useful for good, or evil.  It all depends whose hands the tool is in.  Criminals who use guns are no different, as I see it, than hackers who turn off traffic signals or mess with air traffic control.  Yet so far we don’t have to register mice and keyboards.

The problem here is, every year, seems, we get a wandering snake come around the house or shop.  Nothing 20-feet long like in Anaconda.  Just your common everyday copperhead, cotton mouth, or coral snake.  I know where the coral snake family lives and we have a deal:  I leave them alone and they leave me alone.

With the weather warm again, we are on the lookout for our first slithering visiting.  When they show up it will depend where they are and how I decide to remove them.  #4 bird shot from a 12-gauge  is a nice stand-off approach while the .22 with rat shot is good for closer –in work.  A Glock or Ruger with rat shot is a kind of middle ground.

Last year, in honor of my liberal friend, when the first snake of the season showed up, I tried an experiment.  I was bound and determines to try liberalism.  So I  began by trying to talk the snake to death.

I’ll told him about Newton, MA, the Boston Bomber, and since he didn’t seem to trust me, I reviewed most of the major gun crimes cases of the past 100-years.

Read More

Yes – NBC as in nuclear, chemical, and biological. The HI is hunger immigration which we’ll come to presently.

Our thinking this week?  It’s time to get a lot more serious about our prepping, why we do it, and the “other agenda” that may be working.

Read More

You may be wondering “How did you manage to blow the outlook for Monday so badly – usually Ure much closer to right?”

The answer is simple:  The markets have entered “Upside-Down” mode.

Here’s how it works:

In “right-side up” mode, the market would have looked at the trashy job numbers of last Friday when the market was closed.  The futures seemed to have it called right – down well over a hundred Dow points in the pre-open.

This would be a normal reaction to sucky data. 

When markets entered the “Upside-Down” mode, however, bad news becomes good news.

The market fears higher rates like some people worry about a heart attack.  What’s going on now is that the bad news is seen as running the Federal Reserve out of the rate-raising game.

This upside-down (bad news is actually good) would persist a while, too.  2,100-2,150 on the S&P is not out of the question. 

The risk of such insanity is also why I have made no secret of my love of cash – the third way – and in Depressions, in which –  as the history books teach us –  Cash is king.

Critical Fed Data Due

The one thing to be aware of in markets today is the release of the Federal Reserve’s Consumer Debt figures.  Called the “Consumer Credit Report” (because they’re on the receiving end of the debt – on this side of the table it’s the yoke of debt slavery) it looked like this going into today’s data due out at 3 PM Eastern:

There are two types of debt reported:  Revolving which is things like credit cards.  Non-revolving is the other and that includes things like student loans.

One of the real problems with the data is that it is aged well before release.  The numbers coming out today will reflect data for February and this is April, right?  So trying to get much more than a general sense of things is like trying to drive by looking in the rearview mirror with binoculars.

This data series, along with retail sales and consumer price data are conditions where “upside-down” market thinking could be a plus for bulls.

I forget where I read it, but the term “best dirty shirt in the laundry pile” certainly is a fair summary of how the US markets look compared to Europe and many other places.  Our Peoplenomics™ Trading Model has been consistently right through this market – proving my gut (although smaller from dieting – see Coping) is still not as good as my math.

Here Comes Paul

I think Rand Paul would make a dandy president.  He comes from good stock, my ultra liberal friends hate him, so he can’t be all bad.  And he’s trying to walk a fine line between Tea Party ideals and conservative GOP purse strings – not an easy hike at best.

The announcement will be coming up at Louisville.

Since we’re months away from football season, this morning would be a fine time to kick off the UrbanSurvival Fantasy Politicians League.

That’s because the American public is denied real choice because of the duopoly that the R’s and D’s have used to smother good ideas.

Hence, I think it would be dandy if voting laws could be changed so we could elect president and vice presidents from either party.

I think a Rand Paul/Elizabeth Warren ticket, for example, would make a lot of sense.  It would chill the reactionary right, be progressive on TP and conservative D issues, yet not wander off the board on the socialist path.  I believe the two personalities would keep each other in check, too.

The Wikipedia discussion of how the VP process worked early in the Nation’s history is worth review:

“Under the original terms of the Constitution, the electors of the Electoral College voted only for office of President rather than for both President and Vice President. Each elector was allowed to vote for two people for the top office. The person receiving the greatest number of votes (provided that such a number was a majority of electors) would be President, while the individual who received the next largest number of votes became Vice President. If no one received a majority of votes, then the House of Representatives would choose among the five candidates with the largest numbers of votes, with each state’s representatives together casting a single vote. In such a case, the person who received the highest number of votes but was not chosen President would become Vice President. In the case of a tie for second, then the Senate would choose the Vice President.^[28]

The original plan, however, did not foresee the development of political parties and their adversarial role in the government. For example, in the election of 1796, Federalist John Adams came in first, but because the Federalist electors had divided their second vote amongst several vice presidential candidates, Democratic-Republican Thomas Jefferson came second. Thus, the President and Vice President were from opposing parties. Predictably, Adams and Jefferson clashed over issues such as states’ rights and foreign policy.^[29]

The key part was the development of adversarial political “parties” which is really an American tragedy – it really spelled “The End” of more directly representative government – and the “forced consensus” that the TP still riles against today.

“A greater problem occurred in the election of 1800, in which the two participating parties each had a secondary candidate they intended to elect as Vice President, but the more popular Democratic-Republican party failed to execute that plan with their electoral votes. Under the system in place at the time (Article II, Section 1, Clause 3), the electors could not differentiate between their two candidates, so the plan had been for one elector to vote for Thomas Jefferson but not for Aaron Burr, thus putting Burr in second place.

Read More

One of our readers up in Illinois (Tom the Toolmaker) is going to love this little tale.

As I think I mentioned, Elaine and I are “remodeling” the area between the house and the 40-x 40 pole building that houses my palatial office, Panama’s digs, and a whole bunch of shop equipment. 

Part of the process – which we arrive at today – involves the application of ground cloth – better know in some parts of the country as “weed barrier.”

And I hate putting it down.

That’s because it will take a few hundred ground cloth staples, which are nothing more than bent-up #8 steel wire about 6-inches long.  In the past I’ve cursed this aspect of landscaping because it means walking on your tired-old knees to put in staples in a 1,500 square food area,

Not my idea of fun…no sir, not at all.

But here’s the trick I wanted to pass along:  I’ve found that whenever I find myself shying away from a large project, there’s usually a reason for it.  The reason in this case is sore knees.  I used to have gout (celery seed extract, bilberry, blueberry, and black cherry extract have killed that problem) but I’m still incredibly gun-shy about getting down on the knees.

“OK, genius:  Solve the problem,” I told myself.

Easily done:  I’ve been telling Peoplenomics™ readers for years that I’d a HUGE fan of structured problem – solving.  Once you get the knack of it, there is no other way to approach most (physical) problems in life.  I believe the best single book out there continues to be And Suddenly the Inventor Appeared: TRIZ, the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving.  It ain’t free – try $40-bucks.

The point is this ground staking problem lived in the physical domain.

Under TRIZ (the theory of inventive problem solving) the “inventor” always begins by inspecting the problem – first up one side and then down the other.

Somewhere in following steps, you envision the ideal solution.

Recognizing that “on my knees” was the key deal point of the problem, the ideal solution would be something that would allow me to put in the ground staples without bending over.

Once this became clear, all that was required was a few minutes of visualization of the forces involved and a trip to the workshop. 

In a matter of 10-minutes, a number of slices on the table saws, including a 30-degree angle cut, so the staple wouldn’t slide out at the top, I had created a dandy stand-up ground staple installer.

It’s just  short hunk of 1X4 that is screwed and glued onto a piece of 2X2 and it holds about the top half of the staple.

To use, I simply put a staple in my installer while standing, lower it to the ground and put down. 

Granted, the staple only goes in about 3/4ths of the way, to I flip the tool around where there’s a slot in the 2X2 that pushes the staple down to within 11/2 inch of the ground cloth.  A firmly planted heel does the finishing touch.

This may not be the biggest breakthrough of the week, indeed, it’s pretty simple.  But being inventive – and our use of tools – is what sets us apart from gorillas.  So inventing a tool for every task is something I always try to remember.

In order to have an above-average output level, you need lots of tools and to understand that everything has a recipe to it.

A Recipe Discovery Moment

Speaking of which, one of these days I really will finish “Victims of Process:  How Unwritten Recipes run Your Life.”  The book is a compendium of my experiences in life using the “recipe approach.”

To show you how it works, Elaine and I were talking about her flying lessons.  She’d backed away from learning to fly the airplane because it is a very complex task and she wasn’t comfortable with many parts of it.

When we got to talking about it last night, she revealed something very interesting.  Both her flight instructor and I had overlooked explaining some of the key “hidden recipes” to flying.

The one she brought out was this (paraphrasing):  “When you do the run-up, you turn the key and say one-two, one-two, then you pause and say one, one.   Why do you do that?”

Well, I explained, there are two complete ignition systems on the airplane.  Either one will run the plane, but we always run on both at the same time.

“Huh?”

Yep.  Think of an airplane engine this way:  “It’s built for ultra-high reliability.  This means that although it’s a four-cylinder engine, each cylinder has two sparkplugs.  There are also two magnetos – one for each system”

The counting, I explained, was to ensure that the ignition systems were in the BOTH position because while either one will run the engine fine, there is a small drop in horsepower when you don’t have dual ignition.  The counting out loud ensures the pilot has tested both and has returned the switch to the correct position for take-off and normal operation.

Should one of the plugs become fouled in flight, you can shut off one system or the other, which will oftentimes smooth up the engine while you make it to the nearest airport where you can find a mechanic to find the fouled plug.”

Well, the light went on.

Something that had been one of those great “secret recipes” of flying.  But now that she owns that answer, she’s sneaking back toward lessons.

But the point is that people aren’t often “dumb” about anything.  Rather, it’s just a matter of sharing the right recipe so that they understand what you’re talking about.  In this case, once she heard that there are two ignition systems and the counting ensured I tested system two, then system one, then confirmed I was in BOTH for take-off, she “owned it.”

Flying – and many other pursuits – are what I would call “fully rationalized.”  In other words, there’s a reason for everything we do.

Just like building a good house is fully rationalized and a poorly built home is not.

The difference?  In a poorly built house, door swings will be wrong or awkward, for example.  Or, plumping won’t be installed in a thoughtful manner.

When you’re building an electronic device?  Same thing:  The time to make sure all the wiring and connections are right is when you’re in the layout phase of a printed circuit board.  Now after you have a nearly completed board.  When this happens, you end up installing cuts and jumps which are about as good an indication of incomplete engineering, as you’ll find.

When it comes to interior design, I am not the recipe king:  Elaine’s head, however is perfectly wired for “whole vibe” design.  Me?  No sense of interior design at all.  But hand me the Skil saw, a cutting rig, anything with electronics to it…and I’m that guy.

Recognizing that each partner has different strengths and weaknesses makes for a good relationship…one of the most important “hidden recipes” in life.

The old saying “Women marry men hoping to change them, while men marry women hoping they’ll never change…” doesn’t have to be a hassle.  Provided both parties see the wisdom in the old saying and are able to step back when they don’t have the right recipe.

Speaking of Airplanes:  Hot New GPS

I think I’ve raved about the iFly GPS systems made here in Texas?

Well, as a long-time customer I managed to get one of the first iFly 740 GPS units that they are now shipping.  Click over here and roll down to the Specifications tab and have a look.

I did the burn-in on the 740 last night and OMG what a delight.

Just as an example of state-of-the-art in VFR GPS platforms, the iFly now allows you to overlay weather on top of a sectional or IFR chart.  This used to be a separate screen.

Another is selective WAAS enhancement.  The new unit has built-in WAAS (wide area augmentation service which yields precision as good as 10-feet).  But, since we also have WAAS data interleaved on the ADS-B wireless data stream, the new 740 selects the better of the high precision streams.  It’s almost like having diversity-receiver capability.

But the main reason I upgraded (no, not free) was for the increased screen brightness.  Yes, the old 720 (on the left)is a grand piece of gear and sunlight readable, but in really bright glare, on the yoke, it can be hard enough to make out fine print that you’ll play with the +/- buttons to zoom in an out.

No more.

The iFly 740 (on the right in my un-retouched snapshot from the kitchen counter) is vastly more readable with 1,300 nit brightness.  It’s really impressive.

Since we fly a lot in the sun and have a low-wing airplane, this improvement in visibility under very bright conditions is a real plus.  Either unit displays ADS-B traffic on the sectional, but the new 740 adds a 30-minute onboard battery backup, as well.

The WAAS GPS doesn’t drift around when you’re not moving like the 720 does (in the non-WAAS mode), either.

We don’t waste money on the airplane – and the only reason we can afford it is living in an old trailer in the woods and having no bills.  But like the other recent additions and changes to the plane (not to mention having aggressive maintenance), it’s all about safety and being able to get in and go somewhere if we need or want to.

I’m sure you’ve seen people with cars that are the same way:  Some people maintain their cars so that they can jump in them and drive across the country without giving it a second thought.  Others though, will have half-bald tires, the oil needed changing six months ago, and that slow radiator leak is a problem…

That’s what separates a good car from a bad one, or a classic airplane from a junker. Though not to be confused with the Junkers J-1.

Having Fun With Jade Helm?

My son’s buddy got a new Inmarsat satellite telephone.  Apparently, prices have come down on these things, although $250 a year sim card) and $250-$500 for a used unit on eBay ain’t free.

But he decided to try it out yesterday…and since my son knows that sat-phones are tightly monitored and since Jade Helm is going on (maybe in the ramp up, I figure) it would be interesting to see how alert people are…

My son called to test it, speaking in code, and doing his best imitation of Michael Weston/Burn Notice.  He mentioned grid coordinates and will advise when package delivered and so forth.  I might have mentioned “Hi Bumblehive” or something similar.  I wanted them to know we were just playing.

This could be an interesting experiment, however.

Read More

California water story is in the Coping section (follows this section) this morning…

This could be a pretty interesting weekend for the markets if you like playing weekly options.  (No sane person would, but scratch tickets sell, too, for reasons I’ve never understood either – even when I buy them!)

So here’s the deal:

ADP came out with a job growth number of 180+ thousand on Wednesday.

This morning we see the Challenger, Gray, & Christmas just cut report for March (unless you’re blind, it’s there on the right and, if you are, it was down 36,594).                                          

Here’s why it’s Economic Roulette:  The market (US) is closed tomorrow for Good Friday.  And, in the details to the Challenger press release this morning we read this:

CHICAGO, April 2, 2015 – Following two consecutive months of job cuts in excess of 50,000, the pace of downsizing slowed significantly in March, as US-based employers announced plans to trim payrolls by 36,594 during the month, according to new figures released Thursday by global outplacement consultancy Challenger, Gray & Christmas, Inc.

The March total was 27.6 percent lower than the 50,579 job cuts in February. It was the lowest monthly total since December, when 32,640 were announced. Despite last month’s decline, the March figure was 6.4 percent higher than the same month a year ago (34,399), making it the fourth consecutive year-over-year increase.

Through the first quarter of 2014, employers announced 140,214 job cuts, up 15.6 percent from the 120,341 cuts tracked the first three months of 2014. The first quarter saw 17 percent  more job cuts than in the final quarter of 2014, when 119,763 job cuts were recorded.

Of the 140,214 job cuts announced in the first quarter, 47,610 were directly attributed to falling oil prices.

So here’s the “real deal:”  With 34% of the job cuts coming from the oil sector, and with oil stubbornly under $50 and likely going lower again, shortly, how will tomorrow’s March Unemployment report come out?

If you like scratch tickets, the weekly index options are one way to play it.  But, it may be a little early.  The shake out in the oil patch will be long and painful in a 50 Shades of Oil kind of way.  So it’s too early to yell Uncle! (or whatever your word is).

And if you don’t know what the “your word” reference is, you need to cut economics and go back for a a remedial sex ed course.

Futures are down about 25 – I’m guessing sell-off toward the clothes….or something spelled like that, lol.  More coffee!

In the Wake of Peoplenomics™ Yesterday…

This from our Winnipeg Bureau is worth mentioning:

Dear Mr. Ure,

This may be an opportune moment to visit the public face of Darpa’s “information innovation office” as the window for researchers to join its dark web search engine construction venture draws to a close. The project appears designed to serve internal customers while drawing upon the metadata of general citizenry for predicting patterns of behavior. Perhaps more specific rules of the new war will become apparent as the software gels. However, going forward, being more average than average could be a most profitable risk-aversion strategy?

Read More

Resurrection and Drought for breakfast this morning:

We first covered the coming California Drought/Panic (and potential Diaspora)  back in January of 2014 for our Peoplenomics.com™  subscribers.

What I like to do with Peoplenomics™  (much more so than UrbanSurvival) is look into the future –toward where the data has been pointing – and project what that future will be like when it shows up.

So fifteen months ago, we were considering how the federal protections of frogs and such would lower reservoirs and how the rains had not come, nor would any be expected.

We know a couple of things about California – things modernists and Millennials try to paper-over with scare-tactics about Global Warming and – quick, hide under the bed! – climate change.

The fact of the matter is that climate always has been – and always will be – changing.

Al Gore and others currently reinventing climate as a business model tend to gloss over things like the floods in China 75-years ago – long before the effects of pernicious climate change.

To put a little hair on it, while the USA was going through the worst of the Dust Bowl from a lack of rain, as many as 3.7-million people died in China’s Great Flood of 1931. A factor not so deeply pondered in modern times is that populations density on the planet was much, much lower in the 1930’s…which means that a (population-inflation-adjusted) number could be in the vicinity of 6-10 million dead.

On the one hand, we can see that floods and droughts seem to be spread out over time and over large continental-sized areas.  And, if we care to review the data, we will see that even in fairly close proximity, huge swings in climate always have been occurring at regular intervals.

2013 saw massive devastation in Afghanistan and Pakistan due to?  Floods

Yet, right next door, temporally speaking, we had the drought of 1998-2002 in Pakistan and right now, the D-word is showing up in headlines again:  “Ray of light in Pakistan’s drought-hit Thar desert.”

That BBC headline is perplexing.  It leaves us staring into the coffee grounds this morning and wondering exactly what it is when a desert – already so-named because of a lack of rain – has what?  A lack of rain.  Most perplexing, indeed.

So let’s sit back and consider this California Drought problem a little more closely; without the climate hype and without the globalista’s minions who are trying to consolidate power, raise money, impose taxes, and thereby control lifestyles via whatever levers they can pull.

Don’t be fooled:  There are lots of levers to be pulled:  Racism, Terrorism, Global Warming….but it all comes back to what’s clearly explained in Report from Iron Mountain.  This book – whose origins are still debated – explained back during the Vietnam era what the problem of government was:  There needs to be a massive external enemy that presents such a threat, such an all-pervasive problem, that people will yield their freedom to government.

The book, by the way, points to only a few options, several of which are man-made disease, a massive global healthcare system, aliens from space (grown in Earth-based labs, of course) and a number of other problems.

Climate, I’m sure, would have been included in the book, but it wasn’t until the California Drought of the mid-1970’s that drought really surfaced as a government/citizen control point.

As I noted in my Peoplenomics report (again, this was 15-months ago):

Keep an eye on the major cities of California because a severe hit from the drought could be in the making there.

Just this week, the San Francisco Chronicle (the Chron) was advising its readers to be ready for things to get really, really tough.

Back in 1973 I was offered a job at KFRC and there was a drought on at the time.  The radio station was full of “If it’s yellow, let it mellow, if it’s brown, flush it down” pointers for the local people.  Putting bricks in toilet tanks was promoted, too.

That 2013 was a record dry year is not enough to get people to thinking about relocation.  But another year, a serous lack of water continuing, and that could all change.

But the big picture is already shifting.  In a report this summer for the Hoover Institute at Stanford, Carson Bruno wrote that there was already a 2% net out migration in the 2004-2012 data:

“Looking at age, we see the red flag: individuals are coming to California in their early 20’s and not sticking around. We find that only college-age individuals see a net in-migration into California; all other groups witness a net out-migration, with the 40-to-54 age group — those in the prime of their professional careers — having the highest level of net out-migration.  Despite college age individuals experiencing a net in-migration, the drop-off in the 25-to-39 age group suggests that these individuals are not staying within the state, likely due to the high cost of living in California and/or the lack of employment. “

How Climate Hype Works

To be sure, California has a water problem.  No arguing the point.  As I pointed out in the more recent Peoplenomics piece “The Grand Canals of Earth and Mars – where we talk about two proposals to save California from the drought, there are some solutions available, but they will be the largest geoengineering on the planet yet, and their impacts will likely far surpass even the Three Gorges Dam project in China.

Read More