Liberals Who Can’t Read

As you may know, we keep several “live now” channels up and streaming when news flows and market action is high.  Days like, well, today.

We couldn’t help but notice that ultra-liberals of 18 states and the city of San Francisco have already filed a lawsuit to block the Trump administration’s Executive Order on anchor babies.

When explaining why New Jersey was among states signing on to the suit, their attorney general admitted that more than 450-childred a day   are born to non-citizens. Oh, and he was oh, so wrapped up in righteous anger about it.  California sues Donald Trump over birthright citizenship order.

To us, it looked like another case of “democrats who can’t read.”

You see, when a person is not in the U.S. legally, none of our protections of Citizenship applies.    If democrats are interested in healing their Reality Gap, they need to learn to “slow their roll” a bit and read what was in the EO:

“The Fourteenth Amendment states:  “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”  That provision rightly repudiated the Supreme Court of the United States’s shameful decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), which misinterpreted the Constitution as permanently excluding people of African descent from eligibility for United States citizenship solely based on their race.

But the Fourteenth Amendment has never been interpreted to extend citizenship universally to everyone born within the United States.  The Fourteenth Amendment has always excluded from birthright citizenship persons who were born in the United States but not “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”  Consistent with this understanding, the Congress has further specified through legislation that “a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” is a national and citizen of the United States at birth, 8 U.S.C. 1401, generally mirroring the Fourteenth Amendment’s text. “

Allow me to amplify: If a foreign person is not here legally, the Trump admin argues that no citizenship is conferred.  Simple, and legal, as we read it.

Democrats are trying to “play the race card” by recounting aspects of American history following the Civil War as a hot button.  But, the Trump administration has been excruciatingly clear: if you’re not here legally, no protections.

I am frankly disappointed in the ACLU taking up with the (illiterate) states.  Because originally, the Union was a stricly Constitutionalist (and Bill of Rights) group.  It has, in my view, failed to maintain that clarity of law when comes to illegal border crossers. It’s now more a liberal “cause markting group,” but that’s opinion (and still protected). One who thinks our protections are somehow global!

Still, we harbor concerns that democrats, in addition to being unable to comprehend what the words Border and “legally present” mean, are also doing poorly in math.  Where Nature issues two “genders” and anything beyond two is, again in our view, Cause Marketing.

No.  Enough.

The Change is done.  As we recounted in this morning’s report, time to get on with the Great Rebalancing and rallying around Excellence and Merit.  Be on the bus or under it.

It explains, however, why America’s system of “higher ed” is not as respected as once upon a time.

They gotta learn to read and stop spitballing bullshit half-truths on people.

-ure