The world we humans live in doesn’t do much changing. Oh, sure, we got ISIS trying to take Iraq and Israel is off bombing Syria over the kid, and the USA is now a biggie in soccer. Come to think of it, since cell phones have been around for almost 30-years now, even that falls into my mental “bit bucket” that collects templates rather than the specifics of history.
Whether we like it, or not, the socialization of societies really does come down to a “shared series of templates.”
Stop at the stop sign, go when something is green, stop when red, all that kind of stuff is templated into us at a very young age. And that’s actually a good thing since it reduces the CPU load on our brains in order to allow us to move into this murky stuff called “future” more smoothly; perhaps with some clarity.
REAL advances in humans come infrequently – and mostly when we look at our templates. Which gets us to the most important “story” of the day.
The story headline, “Free will could be the result of ‘background noise’ in the brain, study suggests.” is it.
You should go read the report and then the related content over at Live Science.
The solemnly mind-bending concept is in this quote from the Independent article:
“The brain has a normal level of so-called background noise; the researchers found that the pattern of activity in the brain in the seconds before the cue symbol appeared – before the volunteers knew they were going to make a choice – could predict the likely outcome of the decision. “
You see the problem, right? The decision was “known” ahead of time!
Somewhere, it seems, down in the “noise floor of thinking” there seems to be a ‘signal’ of some sort – the kind that people can “tune-in to.” The signal of “right life?”
Emphasis, please, on the quote from Jesse Bengson of UC-Davis, one of the neuroscientists involved in the study:
“”This random firing, or noise, may even be the carrier upon which our consciousness rides, in the same way that radio static is used to carry a radio station.” “
Note that this is NOT the first time science has wandered into the realm of “pre-decision” knowledge of the future. Could it be that we really do know down at some deep level about the future before it actually arrives, and that’s why, it could be argued, this latest bit of research shows that deciding takes place before the stimulus.,..even if by a second?
The first place I ran across this incredible notion was in
Dean Radin’s landmark paper “Time-reversed human experience: Experimental evidence and implications.” The abstract of Radin’s paper?
“This paper reviews four classes of experimental evidence for time-reversed effects in human experience, examples of phenomena discussed in conventional scientific disciplines that bear a resemblance to time-reversed effects, and a new experiment that distinguishes between information flowing forwards vs. backwards in time. One implication of the cumulative evidence is that time – reversed effects permeate all aspects of human behavior. Another is that experiments in all scientific disciplines may be vulnerable to time –reversed influences, including studies based on gold-standard techniques like double-blind, randomized protocols.