Something is now bothering me – beyond the recent spin-up of 5G which can cause genetic damage. *(My pal the Major and a Doc buddy of ours will be doing a presentation at the upcoming Seaside, OR hamfest.)
We know a number of things:
- U.S. Fed Gov put far more energy than necessary (*or appeared to be dictated by medical science) on getting people to “get the jab.“
- With it’s Mar 22 report, UK weekly Covid surveillance no longer includes death rates after death rates turned higher for people with vaccinations.
- We also see an almost mindless push by the OBiden administration to drive Russia to use of NSNWs in Ukraine and a larger war in Europe.
Today, I sent members of the “Ure’s brain trust” a “Dear Colleagues“ letter. You may find it stimulating to read:
“I was doing some of my “extensible thinking out loud” in the Peoplenomics.com column today.
Then it hit me. One pretty good answer set to the question [my consigliere] and I have been working: namely “What’s the big push by the US (neocons) to get a nuclear exchange going in Ukraine?” popped.
Besides the obvious answer: Russia wants the Dnieper energy deposits and the EU wants another blood donor from their bleed out of middle-class European wealth.
But why the push to theatre-level nukes?
A possible answer came into view as I reviewed in my head the evolution of binary nerve agents. Work great for some (killing) applications, can be fairly benign in transport and storage.
Then it hit me like a ton of bricks: Are Covid-19 AND theater level nukes in Ukraine actually part of a PLAN?
I mean, taken in concert.
This might account for a lot of nefarious activity in recent years; dead and missing microbiologists, and some odd goings-on in nuclear testing compliance surveillance ranks.
So, imagine, if you will:
Extensible thinking (a hallmark of genuinely smart people, which is who the players are) gets the “population die-off plan” to consider Temporal Dispersion of Binary Eugenics Efforts.
In other words, 2020 is the vaccination press. Then, the 2022/2023 plans will involve the likely global increase in background radiation.
What the Data Says
There is not a lot of it but articles like the one following suggest yes, mRNA bio-changes can be “pumped” with low levels of radiation. 5G is on now AND so now comers time to toss in a handful of low level radionuclides., Anyone?
Protein synthesis, or mRNA translation, is one of the most energy-consuming functions in cells. Translation of mRNA into proteins is thus highly regulated by and integrated with upstream and downstream signaling pathways, dependent on various transacting proteins and cis-acting elements within the substrate mRNAs. Under conditions of stress, such as exposure to ionizing radiation, regulatory mechanisms reprogram protein synthesis to translate mRNAs encoding proteins that ensure proper cellular responses. Interestingly, beneficial responses to low-dose radiation exposure, known as radiation hormesis, have been described in several models, but the molecular mechanisms behind this phenomenon are largely unknown. In this review, we explore how differences in cellular responses to high- vs. low-dose ionizing radiation are realized through the modulation of molecular pathways with a particular emphasis on the regulation of mRNA translation control.
Unanswered are which side of the coin is the press FOR nukes coming from?
If for good, it may be a multi-generational genetic preparation for a warmer (3-5 degree C future). Which might also explain some “managed discrimination” against White populations, who tend to be better at cold tolerance than heat, for example. That would explain why the long-term down-Whiting of American demographics. Down >25% since 1970 as fraction of population with nary a single congressional vote. (Clearly, Congress has lost its command presence.)
On the other hand, the motives may be very dark indeed:
Imagine a demand from off-planet Exo’s that “Before we eat your planet, please pull all the weeds (sick or un-strong people) in advance. Thanks and have some salt handy.”
Or, on another future track, perhaps it’s more along the lines of “With the inbound asteroid coming, we know the planet will only support 500,000 people so we need to die people off before impact and then do a last minute mega migration to survive the species.”
As you see, however: Just embracing the concept of temporal dispersion of killing materials (temporal population controls) does not answer the question “Who are they planning to save ? And Who is behind it? And how to we fuck up their plans – if we even should? Non-simple stuff.
Just more of that “light-hearted, happy thinking” I must be prone to in advance of Nukraine opening the canned sunshine.
Looking for all the actual data we can get. We all have opinions and could care less about those.
Click to Comments to toss in any useful data supporting either line of inquiry you care to. All are welcome.
Earth is a closed system to the plebes.