"Standup Economics"

This economy is a what?

  

    
Updated:
   Saturday September 22,  2007

                        07:55 CDT 
The Free Daily Briefing
-  In depth weekly reports are at  www.peoplenomics.com

 The free public side of Peoplenomics.com

Subscriber
   Entrance

Customer Service

  Local Navigation:  

    Home

    ● Consulting Services

    ● Submit a News Tip

    ● Urban's News Scanner

    ● Last week's Column

    ● Archives & Library

    ● News Source Links

    ● Street Level
      Economics


 
At the

Peoplenomics
  Books
tore:
 

"How to Live on $10,000
 a year (or less!)"

 

  Related Sites
   Peoplenomics

    Half Past Human

    Independence Jrnl

    Elliott Wave on  Deflation

    Bulletproofretirement

    Bull Not Bull

    CoasttoCoastAM.com

 Web Bot Project

    Simple Explanation

    NE Power Outage
    Example

  Favorite Colleagues

    Fiend Bear

     Capitalstool.com
   
 
Jim Kunstler

     Safe Haven

     Life After the Oil Crash

     Peak Oil.com

     Steven Quayle

     Coast to Coast AM

     Moral Equivalent of War

     End Times Report

     Solari Action Network

      News with Views

    

 

North American Earthquakes — Last 72 Hours

 Our Favorite Tool::

http://www.minneapolisfed.org/images/common/cpi.gif

   Vendors  & Such


    Posters:
   
www.epingo.com

    Machine parts:   www.emachineshop.com

   Commodity Trading

   www.fortwealth.com

   Bullion Buying/Selling

   www.kitco.com

   Web Hosting

   www.emwd.com

   Radiation Monitoring

   www.ki4u.com

   Emergency Food Stores

   www.beprepared.com

 

 

 

 

|  Last Week  Peoplenomics    |    Library    |  Independence Journal  | Business news from UrbanSurvival.com's RSS feed 

| Site Disclaimer|  Publisher's Note    | Elliott Wave |    Technorati Profile              |


 

Turning Point Past, Tension Ahead

Now that we're past the final part of the 'emotional release' period which ran from roughly September 3 through the 19th, it's now becoming obvious that the last of the release, at least in financial terms, was the Fed going with a larger than expected rate cut this week.  Curiously, it is in the fallout from the cut that I can pretty clearly see the 70 days (or so) of rising tension developing, as the dollar declines, which should lead to a resumption of the late November emotional release of energies.

 

What the Fed has done is drop the dollar to recent historical lows, and the NY Times headlines "Dollar remains at low ebb."  Ah, and ebb, is it?  I'm glad to know it's just an 'ebb' not a full-scale train wreck, because that's what I expect will come into focus here in the next 70-days or so.

 

The International Herald Tribune's report that the "Lower US rates damp dollar demand" also seems a bit understated.  This weekend, I will give Peoplenomics subscribers some possible price impacts of the dollar decline (along with a handy spreadsheet so person studies of things like your actual home price/valuation change can be assessed) but by far, the two predominate short-term impacts will be on oil prices and imported goods from China.

 

A 20% decline of the dollar in the market basket price (chart above), implies that $80 oil will become $100 oil, and that a $20,000 imported car will become a $25,000.  I think I'll explain to subscribers how we may be in a period when you can 'drive a used Porsche free", too.

 

The key thing is that the Invisible Depression, Part Two, Week One, ended with a nominal gain in the Dow and the metals, that will likely fade into obscurity next week, as I'd look for the markets to pull back a bit and for recent commodity gains, including metals to consolidate.  But, from there, my sense is that we'll be up, up, and away in commodities.  (Disclosure: I own commodity options and and am short Oct gold via gold puts while long Dec. silver via call options going into next week - and no, this is not trading advice. It's just my crazed-a** trading.   See the site disclaimer.)

 

The slick thing about the Fed move is that it builds a 'paper bridge' over the 55-60 day danger period for economic collapse, as shown in the following chart:

 

 

Naturally, a couple of readers wrote in mightily concerned:  "When George gets bullish, doesn't that mean it's time to bail out of everything and get short?"  Another called me the 'best contrarian investment indicator on the net."  Till a big earthquake which I have penciled in for mid October, anyway...

 

Because the international purchasing power of the dollar has dropped (Thanks, Ben!) the Canadian Loonie has put in its best weekly performance since 1988.  And, on the flip side, because it's a real physical thing that can't just be printed up at will, "Gold near 27-year high as dollar slumps, oil close to record highs" reports CNN Money.

 

$7 Billion Refinery

Royal Dutch Shell has announced plans to build a new refinery down around Port Arthur, Texas.  Apparently, these folks haven't heard/read about the global coastal event which continues to accrete values in the linguistics work from www.halfpasthuman.com, but it promises to be a short-term economic bonanza.

 

But while this promises some short-term construction, engineering, and development jobs, longer term, it will probably result in only a few hundred jobs, if that; the state of refinery automation being what it is an all.

 

Which brings me to a morning coffee 'ponder point'.  There was a time when a $7-billion project would create thousands of jobs.  The problem with high productivity capital expenditures is they become more and more efficient till what we're left with is a capex-driven -jobless growth- economy, that I notice no one in policy positions is talking about.  With good reason, I suppose.

---

And despite the mini-boom this refinery project will create, the Texas legislature continues stealing from the public by selling of publicly funded roads via toll concessions for private interests in order to pocket short-term revenue.  Theft by conversion, is what I'd call it.   Texas is not alone - that's something going on in all states now under the guide of Public-Private Partnerships.  Secretive theft of public assets at sweetheart-deal prices.

---

Historically, we're in a curious period, analogous I'd venture, in many ways, to the mergers of governments and the Church that happened between 200 A.D. and perhaps the Middle Ages. 
Except this time, it's the corporations stepping into direct control of government (the Churches role was over when Time headlined "Is God Dead?" back when - in a governance sense, they were right). 

 

The American Heritage Dictionary's definition of fascism comes to mind: "A philosophy or system of government that is marked by stringent social and economic control, a strong, centralized government usually headed by a dictator, and often a policy of belligerent nationalism."  Oh sure, it's an overworked 'hot' word emotionally, but it seems accurate along in here.

 

This leads me to conclude that the corporation is assuming the same role of the Church in previous times, and thus, corporate interests are now able to play out an updated version of the Spanish Conquest of the New Land.  In the historical record, religion was militarily exported to the Americas and in return, the Spanish received boatloads of gold as plunder. 

 

In today's updated corporate version of the same game (power & control, an a piece of the tribute action), the corporations provide a 'war machine' of parallel magnitude (scaled for global population) to export Western values worldwide, and their plunder is debt-paper holders, toll road control, and as we saw this week, "more favored than human citizen" status with bailouts for Wall Street; whilst Main Street (lined with foreclosures) be damned.

 

Didn't mean to get sidetracked, but the broad view of how corpgov has come into being is important.

 

Just as the Second Council of Nicaea was a major turning point for the Church powers, where salvation/enlightenment was turns from universally and individually attainable to something requiring obedience to authority and payment of some kind to get there, so too, the recent diminution of individual rights in America for corporate purposes has established the corporate interest above humans in such areas using such tools as eminent domain, and the list goes on. 

 

Freedom, like enlightenment prior to the Second Council, is being contained, quashed, and squashed by a Power Elite that now effectively runs a single-government system in the USA.  Corporations mostly give money to both the democorps and republicorps, and the power-trippers seeking ego fulfillment in office gladly take the bait.

 

Not that the process has been overnight, but rather progressive.   As just a single example, recall how government/corporate interests started licensing us of 'the air' with the imposition of the Communications Act of 1934, and the progressive theft of free access and imposition of government control has continued ever since.  Witness the corporate moves for another internet and efforts to sink net neutrality, more recently.  Accountability for the use of the airwaves was ended in the 1980's  as corporate broadcasters successfully lobbied against annual reporting and Public Broadcasting was held up as an adequate check and balance.  All of which gets me to:

 

Rather Leaking Truth

It's against this historical perspective (which we could debate endlessly, I'm sure) that we read up on how Dan Rather is suing his one-time masters at CBS for $70-million.  He's making an issue of government and corporate influence over newsrooms:

"Somebody, sometime has got to take a stand and say democracy cannot survive, much less thrive with the level of big corporate and big government interference and intimidation in news," he said on CNN's "Larry King Live."

All of which sounds quite laudable, but is it?  An LA Times headline suggests "Dan Rather wanders too far off script" while somewhere in the back of my mind, I recall Rather is reported to be a co-owner in a ranch with, among others, former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. 

 

Egged On

Turns out human eggs may be grown outside the body, says some new science.   With the world grossly over-populated, why fertility research is worthy of so much spending is just beyond my pay grade.  What happened to adopt?

 

Tropically Depressed

Don't feel alone.

 

Thompson Quip

On the light side: Fred Thompson video clip.  "My wife would make a much better First Lady than Bill Clinton, what do you think?"

 

Castro's Reading Material

An alert Fidel Castro was on TV in Cuba this week...and holding a copy of Alan Greenspend's book, if I am looking at this picture right.

 

Cell Phone Damage

Headline this: "Using your mobile over an hour a day can harm hearing."  Say what?

 

License Illegals

Oh yeah - now the state of New York has dropped the requirement for showing proof of citizenship to get a license to drive.  But wait!  What about the corpgov push for RealID?

 

Is the world nuts?  Oh, foolish me.  I withdraw the question.

 

Where is East

Farmerly Astronomy: Because I am all wrapped up in construction/remodeling and such due to our Great Water Heater Disaster of 2007, I forgot to mention that you can run out at sunrise this morning and watch where the sun pops up, and where it sets tonight.  Put a take in the ground in a line from your observation point to the sunrise this morning.  Tonight return to exactly the same observation point and then another line at tonight's sunset.  Or, if you read this column late, do the sunset tonight and the sunrise tomorrow.

 

A string or line stretched between the two stakes will give you very, very close to an exact East-West line (better had we done this yesterday morning and again this morning and the two night observations, but it'll be damn close.  A line perpendicular to your string will be the North-South line where you live.

 

If you don't trust your eyeballs, you can get a string which is 2/3'rds the length of the stake-to-stake distance and put a loop on one end of it.  Then slip the loop over one stake and draw a half circle between the stakes.  Repeat this circle drawing for the other stake and you'll find that at two places the circle scribing will intersect with a couple of rounded x's.  A line between these two x's will be your perpendicular line to east/west, the north-south line.

 

When you get your lines drawn, and are confident that you know will then be able to calculate with Mayan-like precision whether your home was oriented by detail-oriented people, or just thrown onto the property by randomists, who didn't take the time to square things up.

 

Oh, yeah, this also qualifies you to become a  "46th-degree UrbanSurvival Practitioner."

 

Peoplenomics: Can the Dollar's Death be Cheated This Week?

This promises to be one hell of an interesting week, and although the original plan (Saturday's, but these things are constantly changing) was to write up the likelihood of China not putting up with Taiwanese independence (to the point of UN recognition) has to take a backseat to the more complex global economic stew:  "Can dollar death be cheated, once again?"  We've got a number of things to look at, including my "peak to crash" chart, some nuances from my OBV options theory, the Fed meeting, Greenspan comments, and more, not to mention building tensions in the Middle East and even a new investment idea - so let's turn on the 'analysis blender' and see if we get daiquiris or garbage disposal output, shall we?  The 19th/Turn Date is almost here, and there are plenty of 'life shifting' events out on the horizon to be considered.  Got coffee?

 

                    More for Subscribers      Subscription Information

 

THE Definitive Bumper Sticker

To get your "No Incumbents in 2008" click here.  They're just $5.  And no, that would not keep Ron Paul from running for the White House - he is not an incumbent for that office - having never held that job before, you see.

 

Viral Marketing

If you find the alternative contexting of major financial and global affairs presented on this site of interest, please tell your friends about it.  That way, more people will become aware of what's going on in the economy, and with more smarts, maybe we can wake up America. Click here to shake them from their sleep.  Also, if you operate a website, a link is always appreciated and I will link in return.

 

Live Better for Less

Order our handy ebook "How to Live on $10,000 a year or less - and learn to live like a Third World person now.  It's coming anyway, with big job layoffs this summer - and by ordering now, you can beat the rush...You may have more time to read this fall if the economy falls apart as I expect...

 

Last week's report is here.


Friday September 21, 2007

Triple Witches Take Profits and Fly

After some deliberating, I decided to book some commodity profits, setting up for the end-of-month weakness that I expect next week.  On the first day of fall, my commodity account is up 244% while my stock about is now down 98% because I went short in a major way and the Fed move this week put the nail in my S&P puts, so my overall return for the quarter is only 11%.

---

In addition to clearing my gold call options, I also cleared my corn (nature's gold) options, as well.  With the except of a few silver calls for December, I'm basically sitting in cash.  Come next week, I will likely re-enter positions, but I expect some end-of-month downward pressure in the very short term, especially for gold, which some of my friends think will be pressed down to the $700 range.

 

THIS IS NOT TRADING ADVICE - THIS IS WHAT I AM DOING IN MY OWN ACCOUNTS.  SEEK PROFESSIONAL ADVISE.  READ MY DISCLAIMER PAGE!

---

Although the Fed move took many by surprise, I was even more surprised when I received an email informing me that Fed Governor Frederick Mishkin has a new paper out titled "Will Monetary Policy Become More of a Science?"  Shoot, I though they had developed the art of torpedoing my put option to a 'science' already.  Writes Miskin in the opening:

"In this paper, I will review the progress that the science of monetary policy has made over recent decades. In my view, this progress has significantly expanded the degree to which the practice of monetary policy reflects the application of a core set of “scientific” principles. Does this progress mean that, as Keynes put it, monetary policy will become as boring as dentistry--i.e. that policy will be reduced to the routine application of core principles, much like filling cavities?1 I will argue that there remains, and will likely always remain, elements of art in the conduct of monetary policy; in other words, substantial judgment will always be needed to achieve desirable outcomes on both the inflation and employment fronts."

While I've got the  balance of the paper on my reading list, a quick scan didn't find the word foreclosure, and the word "political" was only used once outside of foot notes and the appendix, so it's going to take more reading of what's between the lines to figure out what he's saying.  A scan of a few more pages says it's a sales piece for Fed control of of inflation and employment, but no where does the term "sound money" appear.  Call me a cynic...  "Cynic!"

 

What Sound Money?

Clearly, the decisions the Fed is making are outside of historical norms - and after Greenspend managed to roughly halve dollar purchasing power during his tenure at the Fed, we can only surmise that Bernanke, et al, will continue that fine tradition.  Headlines like "Euro roars to record high 1.4120 dollars" attest to the notion that 'Printing Press Ben" is off to a fine state.

 

Think I'm being to harsh on the Fed?  Well, you don't need George Ure to do that - there are Canadians, after all.  Not exactly dancing in the streets, but "Canada "loonie" on par with US Dollar" makes a more convincing case that me.  Ooops - over par now.  So sorry.

 

As the People's Economist, I would argue that the price of oil, which is making new highs lately, still has the same intrinsic value as it had 5-years ago.  What has changed?  The purchasing power of the dollar.  Oh, and as the dollar gasps, "Oil puts Canada's currency ahead of the US dollar" notes one headline. Yessir. Got that.

 

Peak Oil

What escapes the attention of the popular press (with a few shining exceptions) is that we have two massive 'super trends' that are colliding right in front of your investment portfolio, and yet the implications of the collapse are not seen by the average investor. 

 

In addition to the Fed hollowing out purchasing power of the dollar (to bail out the multi-gazillionaires who made bad/greed-driven subprime predatory loans, and then sold them off as triple A paper, there's this little matter summed up in this morning's Globe and Mail:

 

"Two barrels of oil are used for each one found.  $100 oil anyone?"

 

My guess?  Given that we don't have a massive economic shock (like Quake #3 in the linguistic outlook hitting a key production or shipping center for global trade) I would have to expect that by this time next year, the price of oil will be more on the order of $140 - because as the Fed goes with the 'easy money' plan, not only will pernicious long-term inflation be setting in, but along with that the short-term economic stimulus will continue to drive up demand.  Inflation plus resupply shortage by oil.  Gee, let me think: What might that spell for oil prices?

 

Waiting Around for Inflation

We're not alone, thinking this way.  John Waggoner writes in USA Today this morning that "Inflation Lurking?  Adjust portfolio just in case."

---

Inflation shouldn't take all that long to show up.  You can get snips of it everywhere - it's not not actually here yet.  And besides, when it does show up, we have a one or two month period of hysterisis (time lag) till the new price levels are recorded by the guv'mint and then they will be hedonically hoaxed up as best they can to show "Everything is normal, this is a great economy, Citizen."

 

Don't Overlook Climate Changes, Either

One of our tea-drinking readers, who gets the daily newsletter from the UK's Nothing But Tea web site and tea store,  said that yesterday's newsletter basically advised customers that climate change might have some impact on tea prices sooner than later:

"This has had an impact on tea production, this years teas from China where they have been suffering from drought, are available in lower quantities and some differ in appearance from previous years, though they still have the same great taste.

Assam has been hit by floods and tea production has dropped significantly as a result.

South India where the Nilgiri teas are grown has experienced severe drought and frost with just a single company losing around £120,000 worth of their crop. Due to the severe damage caused the tea bushes may take some time to recover and crop loss will last at least six months.

Due to a freak hailstorm in Kenya which lasted over two hours, 10,000 workers were sent home for two months while tea bushes recover. This caused Unilever alone an estimated $1,000,000 worth of crop loss!"

They pointed out some positives too, but I got the sense that weather would impact my periodic sips of orange spiced tea, a habit on hold for the past few months due to the high temps here in East Texas.

---

Remember that food prices are a combination of input costs - and oil is among those, too.  So if you have bad weather and rising oil (which hit $84 yesterday), you have to figure that what's in the supply chain will be going higher.

 

A year ago, my neighbor was paying about $8.75 for a 50 pound sack of medicated goat feed.  I just bought some and it was over $10.  Pencil in at least 18% inflation for meat goats, and I expect, similar increases for chickens, cows, anything that eats.

 

Remember that food prices were up 4.2% in the latest reporting month and that hasn't escaped notice of the national agriculture folks.

 

Email of the Day

From up in the Front Range country:

"Help George,

I can see how the Fed’s actions are causing inflation. (ie gold and oil prices, etc.) However, I still don’t understand why.

Do our lower interest rates look bad to the international market? Did the Fed do two actions at once, lower interest rates and print money?

Thanks, Confused in Denver"

Our lower interest rates don't just look bad to international investors, they look "butt ugly, whupped with an ugly stick" outside our own borders.  Let's say you were in China and you bought a US Treasury paying 5% when the dollar was at 82 on the market basket. 

 

today the dollar has traded down to about 78.30.  Let's do the math.  78.30 divided by 82 is .954878%.    1 minus that means the currency swing overseas has just dropped the purchasing power of the treasury instrument by 4.5%.  Now, since this might happen in less than a year, you can see where the Chinese would be getting nervous: They have dollar denominated instruments that can drop faster than the interest accrues -- following this?

 

On the second part of your question:  No, the Fed didn't exactly print money.  What they did was encourage others to print money.

 

When is money created?  If I sell you a widget on a time payment plan and charge interest, I am really 'creating money'.  So by lowering interest rates, the Fed is encouraging more borrowing and economic activity. While it may not show up in M1 or M2 (and remember they hid M3), the corporate creation of money goes balls out.  Housing loans fire up a bit, and inflation follows. 

 

The art of being a Fed governor (or Chair) is to keep these things running by your own plan, remembering that we are in an "Invisible Depression" and so the balance is delicate between hyper inflating and wild deflation.    Hope this helps...

 

Ure Construction and Plumbing

We got the subfloor which was soaked by our water heater disaster all exposed yesterday.  Now, just a couple of hours to replace the subfloor, rough in the replacement supply pipes and run the 10-2/g wire, pop in the new breakers, and we should be back in hot water today. I'll try to get a picture for tomorrow of the demolition work - been quite a project - and much to her credit, Elaine has been doing a lot of it.  Such is life on a homestead.  Teamwork followed by a beer.  It's a lot more personable that texting back and forth to your spouse, and for sure more fun...

---

That will leave me all weekend to finish up the goat fencing - just 600 feet of fence to go.  Yee haw!

 


Thursday September 20, 2007

Update: The New Five Dollar Bill

No, not a Amero - think of this as a Purple Back New from those "All debts public and private" guys.  Hey!  Maybe the recession will be a one-eyed, one-gov, flying purple paper-eater, huh?

 

Hell, I'm sol old I can remember when money (paper) was backed byt he "full faith and credit of the United States."   Whatzzat?

 

$5 doesn't go far on Wall St. so let's open that repo window!

 

Invisible Crash - Part Two, Day Two

Grudgingly, I have to admit that the Powers That Be and the Fed have been doing a swell job of managing the Invisible Crash - which is what I call it simply because most people don't get what's going on right in front of them.  It's almost like a game of three-card Monte.  While the nimble fingered trickster might object, "Call it "follow the Lady," they'd say, I call it "Follow the Bubble, Follow the Terror Show, and then Follow the Dollar," around here.

 

To bring you up to date  The Beginning of the Second Depression came in March 2000 when the markets hit all-time highs and the Big Decline began.  As it picked up steam on the downside, millions of investors lost trillions of dollars.  Then, about the time that the SEC was getting ready to really do something about naked shorting, and (then there's the gold and silver) etc., along come a couple of airplanes which wiped out two buildings and their contents, which in turn gives rise to a War On Terror (a modern analog to the Civilian Conservation Corp of the 1920's and the Works Progress Administration), and that has just been trumped (no, not the Don) by the surprise rate reduction this week.  You "follow the Lady" here, right?

 

Not that I would do anything differently if I had a few trillions:  Imagine the pandemonium, human suffering, loss of jobs/life/economic clout, that would have accompanied the US's descent into an obvious Second Depression should the WTC attack not taken place!  There would be no missing data for the SEC, there would be not War on Terror, there would be no Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Saddam Hussein would still be alive, although he'd be isolated and still trading oil under the table, no doubt.  Oh, and something north of half a million Iraqi civilians would still be breathing.

 

Instead what we have is an OK economy (as long as you believe the numbers), a huge variable-spending opportunity to keep the economy going, and a Fed that continues to try and walk the tightrope between an inflationary workout of things (like the Weimar Republic) or a deflationary work out like the USA's first Great Depression.

 

So what's an investor to do?  First, let's be realistic.;  If you try to get straight answers, such as the real report on 9/11/Twin Towers (Why did building 7 fall down unless it was a rigged explosion, anyway?), or trying to get a question answered by one-time presidential hopeful John Kerry, you're like to get tased (or worse) and that's that.  Or, if your actions can be wildly construed as supportive of "terrorists" then your property can be seized and you'll be out on the street.  So, let's not rock the boat, at least too much.

---

Now, here we are at the precipice of what could be a huge decline in purchasing power of the US Dollar and the Fed continues its great economics experiment, gambling (with the whole world's global economy in the pot (to put it in Texas Hold 'Em terms, we're all in on this) walking that tightrope.  However, an investor like me sees two immediate impacts.

 

The first is that the US is probably about top lose it's place as the World Reserve Currency.  What that means in a nutshell, is that the USA's paper won't buy as much as it used to.  Check the dollar basket price above and you'll see that today it took out 79 and dropped down to the 78+ range.

 

OK, in reaction to that we're seeing the price of commodities go up.  Gold is up, silver is up, oil is up, and even my corn play on the commodities exchange is doing just dandy.  So well, in fact, that my broker JB called this morning to tell me that my "nature's gold - corn" was looking good at the open because exports nearly doubled in the latest reporting week.  Fine.  Saw that coming.

 

THIS IS NOT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANYTHING IN YOUR ACCOUNTS.  I WRITE THIS SITE BECAUSE I FEEL LIKE IT AND IT'S ABOUT MY OWN EXPERIENCES AS A JOURNALIST AND ECONOMIST AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSTRUED AS INVESTMENT ADVICE.  INVESTING THE WAY I DO INVOLVES SUBSTANTIAL RISK AND MAY RESULT IN THE LOSS OF 100% OF YOUR INVESTMENT.  IN COMMODITIES, YOU CAN EVEN LOSE MORE THAN 100% IF YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU'RE DOING.  SEEK PROFESSIONAL ADVICE BEFORE TRADING.  CONSIDER GAMBLERS ANONYMOUS.  OPTIONS TRADING AND STOCK TRADING INVOLVES RISK.  DO NOT BET MORE THAN YOU CAN AFFORD TO LOSE.  (Whew!  Need more coffee after that.).

 

The second point is that George in the outback of East Texas (we still get tax bills and have an Outback up the road, so it's not exactly the ends of the earth) is not the only one who sees the dollar losing value.  Take the headline "Fears of dollar collapse as Saudis take fright"

 

Much to their credit (or is that debt?) the Fed so far seems to have engineered a fine and orderly decline of the dollar.  Naturally, the way I see it, real things are just about guaranteed to go up in price as the dollar declines.  Things like anything made overseas, because the dollar won't buy as much there anymore.  Yet, despite the prospect of $800-$1,000 gold, $100 oil, and enough money to take Elaine on a cruise from the corn options, this new leg down (care to be on the next crisis being about 70 days down the road from here?), most people don't have their heads open enough to either see, or let alone play along with, the evolving picture.

 

The meaning of headlines like "Gold hits 28-year high after dlr sinks to record lows" just doesn't seem to register with folks.

 

Here's a hint:  "If you see inflation coming, buy things.  If you see deflation coming, own secured debt."  I told you in 2005 that I was buying silver when it was under $7 an ounce.  Today, it's over $13.  In 2001, I told you I was buying gold when it was $280 an ounce.  Go check today's prices.  I told you I was buying farm land here in East Texas when it was $1,843 an acre.  Today, it's selling for between $3,000 to $4,000 an acre, depending on parcel.

 

But here's something you should write down and frame in your office or put on the refrigerator door someplace:

 

"PRICE MEANS NOTHING UNLESS YOU ARE BUYING OR SELLING"

 

We're not inclined to be selling anything in here, and if the Fed's efforts work (to inflate just enough to keep the system from imploding - an interesting notion - then hanging on to a house might be a good thing.  The challenge is to keep a roof over your head at the lowest possible price, now that the Fed's (inflationary) hand has been tipped.

 

If your house price has gone down 15-25%, it might take a couple of years for your former value to be puffed back up again, however, and then there is the risk the Fed will get things wrong along the way.

 

My deflationist friend Jas Jain sent me an interesting table he's worked up covering house prices in California:

(Prices peaked at different times in various counties and cities)

"CA Declines From The Peak

Merced County -26.3% Yolo County -23.7% Sacramento County -19.5% Stanislaus County -18.8% San Joaquin County -18.6% Nevada County -17.0% Madera County -16.9% Placer County -16.8% San Benito County -16.0% Tulare County -15.1% Santa Barbara County -13.7% El Dorado County -12.7% Solano County -12.6% Sonoma County -12.1% Fresno County -12.0% Kern County -11.8% Napa County -11.1% San Luis Obispo County -10.8% San Diego County -9.5% Riverside County -9.2% Ventura County -8.7% Santa Cruz County -7.7% Marin County -6.3% Monterey County -5.6% San Bernardino County -5.3% Contra Costa County -5.0% San Francisco County -3.0% Orange County -1.7% San Mateo County -1.4% Santa Clara County -0.7% Alameda County 0.0% Los Angeles County 0.0%

Cities:

FRESNO -11.8% SACRAMENTO -15.4% STOCKTON -23.4%"

And yes, the housing collapse is still ongoing, as a reader in Arizona checks in with this:

"George,

Last year last month home building permits were between 700 and 800 units.

This year last month was 74.

Lot's of laid off trades folks."

And no, the return of 'easy money' by the Fed is not going to bail out people who are already upside down and about to get trashed by resetting of home mortgage rates on all those ARM's that blow up over the next couple of months. 

 

We've got two days now of a close over 1,521 on the S&P 500 - and as I told you before, it is possible for the stock market to go up while the rest of the economy looks terrible, simply because the stock market is valued like an apartment house in a period of inflation.  So, don't be surprised to see the stocks go to all-time record highs now, while you can't find a job, or find the price of milk heads to $7 a gallon.  That's just the breaks.

 

My friend Robin Landry, who has a computer model that has been bullish on the market all through this latest decline, says he thinks the market may have one more huge run up ahead of it.  He's looking for a Dow north of 16,000 and I wouldn't bet against Landry's model.  "Every dad-gum time I go against my model, I lose money, George and it says we're going up..." he told me.

 

No doubt, some readers will take my current outbreak of inflation optimism as a sure sign the gates of hell are about to open on the downside.  But, for now, that's how I see it:  The three-card Monte game has one more move left - a massive 5th of the 5th of the 5th to come before things sink. 

 

Next stops as I see it now?  At least a 70-day slide of the dollar, a Dow of 15,000+ as a consequence, and roaring commodities. 

 

Today, while jobs numbers will be reported strong, "Paulson, Bernanke prepared to defend response to Housing Slump" on capital hill.

 

Here's Bernanke's rap:

"Testimony Chairman Ben S. Bernanke

Subprime mortgage lending and mitigating foreclosures Before the Committee on Financial Services, U.S. House of Representatives

September 20, 2007

"Chairman Frank, Ranking Member Bachus, and members of the Committee, I am pleased to appear before you to discuss the origins of the problems in the subprime-mortgage market and the response of the Federal Reserve to these developments. I will also discuss some possible legislative options for addressing these concerns.

Recent Developments in the Subprime-Mortgage Sector Let me begin with some background on the subprime-mortgage sector. Subprime mortgages are loans intended for borrowers who are perceived to have high credit risk. Although these mortgages emerged on the financial landscape more than two decades ago, they did not begin to expand significantly until the mid-1990s. The expansion was fueled by innovations--including the development of credit scoring--that made it easier for lenders to assess and price risks. In addition, regulatory changes and the ongoing growth of the secondary mortgage market increased the ability of lenders, who once typically held mortgages on their books until the loans were repaid, to sell many mortgages to various intermediaries, or "securitizers." The securitizers in turn pooled large numbers of mortgages and sold the rights to the resulting cash flows to investors, often as components of structured securities. This "originate-to-distribute" model gave lenders (and, thus, mortgage borrowers) greater access to capital markets, lowered transaction costs, and allowed risk to be shared more widely. The resulting increase in the supply of mortgage credit likely contributed to the rise in the homeownership rate from 64 percent in 1994 to about 68 percent now--with minority households and households from lower-income census tracts recording some of the largest gains in percentage terms.

However, for all its considerable benefits, the broadening of access to mortgage credit that has occurred during the past decade also had important negative aspects. Not surprisingly, given their weaker credit histories and financial conditions, subprime borrowers default on their loans more frequently than prime borrowers. The consequences of default may be severe for homeowners, who face the possibility of foreclosure, the loss of accumulated home equity, and reduced access to credit. In addition, clusters of foreclosures can lead to declines in the values of nearby properties and do great damage to neighborhoods.

During the past two years, serious delinquencies among subprime adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs) have increased dramatically. (Subprime mortgages with fixed rates, on the other hand, have had a more stable performance.) The fraction of subprime ARMs past due ninety days or more or in foreclosure reached nearly 15 percent in July, roughly triple the low seen in mid-2005.1 For so-called near-prime loans in alt-A securitized pools (those made to borrowers who typically have higher credit scores than subprime borrowers but still pose more risk than prime borrowers), the serious delinquency rate has also risen, to 3 percent from 1 percent only a year ago. These patterns contrast sharply with those in the prime-mortgage sector, in which less than 1 percent of loans are seriously delinquent. Higher delinquencies have begun to show through to foreclosures. About 320,000 foreclosures were initiated in each of the first two quarters of this year (just more than half of them on subprime mortgages), up from an average of about 225,000 during the past six years. Foreclosure starts tend to be high in states with stressed economic conditions and to rise where house prices have decelerated or fallen.

Adjustable-rate subprime mortgages originated in late 2005 and in 2006 have performed the worst, with some of them defaulting after only one or two payments (or even no payment at all). Relative to earlier vintages, more of these loans carried greater risks beyond weak borrower credit histories--including very high initial cumulative loan-to-value ratios and less documentation of borrower income. In addition, the sharp deceleration in home prices since 2005, including outright declines in some markets, left many of these more-recent borrowers with little or no home equity. In this situation, some borrowers (particularly owner-investors) may have found that simply walking away from their properties was their best option. Moreover, low home equity has made refinancing--the typical way for many subprime borrowers to avoid large scheduled interest rate resets--difficult or impossible for many. Thus, with house prices still soft and many borrowers of recent-vintage subprime ARMs still facing their first interest rate resets, delinquencies and foreclosure initiations in this class of mortgages are likely to rise further. It is difficult to be precise about the number of foreclosure initiations expected in coming quarters, as it will depend on (among other factors) the evolution of house prices, which will vary widely across localities. Historically, about half of homeowners who get a foreclosure notice are ultimately displaced from their homes, but that ratio may turn out to be higher in coming quarters because the proportion of subprime borrowers, who have weaker financial conditions than prime borrowers, is higher. The rise could be tempered somewhat by loan workouts.

The originate-to-distribute model seems to have contributed to the loosening of underwriting standards in 2005 and 2006. When an originator sells a mortgage and its servicing rights, depending on the terms of the sale, much or all of the risks are passed on to the loan purchaser. Thus, originators who sell loans may have less incentive to undertake careful underwriting than if they kept the loans. Moreover, for some originators, fees tied to loan volume made loan sales a higher priority than loan quality. This misalignment of incentives, together with strong investor demand for securities with high yields, contributed to the weakening of underwriting standards.

The fragmented market structure of mortgage originators in the subprime-lending industry may also have contributed. Data collected under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act show that independent mortgage companies--those that are not depository institutions or their subsidiaries or holding company affiliates--made nearly half of higher-priced first-lien mortgages in 2006 but only one-fourth of loans that were not higher-priced. In addition, some sources report that the majority of mortgages are obtained through a broker, often an independent entity, who takes loan applications on behalf of a depository institution or other lender. The various lending institutions and brokers operate under different regulatory and supervisory regimes with varying intensities of enforcement effort. That fragmentation makes monitoring brokers and lenders difficult for regulators and investors alike.

Markets do tend to self-correct. In response to the serious financial losses incurred by investors, the market for subprime mortgages has adjusted sharply. Investors are demanding that originators employ tighter underwriting standards, and some large lenders are pulling back from the use of brokers. The reassessment and resulting increase in the attention to loan quality should help prevent a recurrence of the recent subprime problems. Nevertheless, many homeowners who took out mortgages in recent years are in financial distress. To help those borrowers, the Federal Reserve, together with the other federal supervisory agencies, has issued two statements--in April, to mortgage lenders; and earlier this month, to mortgage servicers--to encourage the financial industry to work with borrowers to arrange prudent loan modifications to avoid unnecessary foreclosures. The Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS) joined the federal agencies in the second statement. Often, loan workouts are in the interest of all parties. We have also encouraged lenders and servicers to identify and contact borrowers who, with counseling and possible loan modifications, may be able to avoid entering delinquency or foreclosure. The simple step of reaching out to borrowers before they get into trouble can be very productive. In addition, a member of the Federal Reserve Board serves as a director of NeighborWorks America, which encourages borrowers facing payment difficulties to seek help by contacting their lenders, services, or trusted counselors. Recently, NeighborWorks America launched a nationwide advertising campaign to increase awareness of available support from their 24-hour hotline, and they are now responding to 2,000 calls a day, almost double the number in June.

Additionally, the Federal Reserve is working closely with community and industry groups around the country to reduce homeowners' risks of foreclosure. The community affairs offices in each of the Reserve Banks provide significant leadership and technical assistance. For instance, a public-private collaboration initiated by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago with Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago and the City of Chicago produced the Home Ownership Preservation Initiative (HOPI), which began in 2003. In the ensuing three years, the HOPI program counseled more than 4,000 people, prevented 1,300 foreclosures, and reclaimed 300 buildings.2 HOPI has also been a model for foreclosure prevention programs now operating around the country, including in Baltimore and Atlanta and in Ohio. As another example, the community affairs office of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco recently convened a series of workshops to develop community-based solutions to mortgage delinquencies in six cities. More than 700 lenders, housing counselors, community group representatives, and government officials attended.

Regulatory Responses The Federal Reserve takes responsible lending and consumer protection very seriously. Along with other federal and state agencies, we are responding to the subprime problems on a number of fronts. We are committed to preventing problems from recurring, while still preserving responsible subprime lending.

Last year, in coordination with other federal supervisory agencies, we issued principles-based guidance describing safety-and-soundness and consumer-protection standards for nontraditional mortgages, such as interest-only and negative-amortization mortgages. We subsequently issued illustrations to help institutions clearly communicate information to consumers. In June of this year the agencies issued supervisory guidance on subprime ARMs. The guidance describes standards that banks should follow to ensure that borrowers obtain loans that they can afford to repay and that give them the opportunity to refinance without prepayment penalty for a reasonable period before the interest rate resets. We have requested public comment on illustrations to help lenders implement this guidance.

The Board also is committed to providing more-effective disclosures to help consumers defend against improper lending. As I discussed in my testimony to this Committee in July, we recently issued proposed rules under Regulation Z, which implements the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), to improve disclosures related to credit cards and other revolving credit accounts. We are now engaged in a similarly rigorous review of TILA rules for mortgage loans and will be conducting extensive consumer testing of mortgage disclosures for this purpose. In my view, better disclosure of the schedule of mortgage payments over the life of the loan can help borrowers understand the terms of their mortgages and judge their ability to make future payments. Consumers may also benefit from better information about costs, including brokers' fees, when choosing among competing mortgage products. In addition, we are developing two sets of proposed changes to TILA rules--one to address concerns about incomplete or misleading mortgage loan advertisements and solicitations and a second to require lenders to provide mortgage disclosures more quickly so that consumers can get the information they need when it is most useful to them.

Improved and more timely disclosures may not be sufficient in some cases. As I discussed in July, we will use our rulemaking authority under the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act to propose additional consumer protections later this year. We are looking closely at some mortgage lending practices, including prepayment penalties, escrow accounts for taxes and insurance, stated-income and low-documentation lending, and the evaluation of a borrower's ability to repay. The information that we gathered at a public hearing in June and from the subsequent comment letters has been extremely helpful.

The recent problems in subprime lending have underscored the need not only for better disclosure and new rules but also for more-uniform enforcement in the fragmented market structure of brokers and lenders. In that regard, the CSBS has partnered with the American Association of Residential Mortgage Regulators (AARMR) to develop a nationwide licensing system and database for mortgage professionals, and they have made considerable progress. The system is expected to start up in January 2008 with seven states, and another thirty states have committed and will be added gradually. Such a nationwide system would help limit the ability of originators who run afoul of their state regulators to continue operating simply by moving to another state.

Raising the quality of underwriting practices by all lenders to a uniformly high standard is an important objective. To that end, the Board and the other federal agencies worked with the CSBS to apply the two guidance documents I mentioned--on nontraditional mortgages and subprime ARMs--to state-supervised institutions. The CSBS published nearly identical guidance documents and has urged the states to implement them. Many states have done so, or are moving to do so.

To achieve strong and uniform enforcement, interagency cooperation among a variety of federal and state agencies is essential. As I noted in my testimony in July, the Board has launched a pilot program with the CSBS, AARMR, the Office of Thrift Supervision, and the Federal Trade Commission. The goal of this program is to expand and improve consumer protection by strengthening compliance reviews at selected nondepository lenders with significant subprime-mortgage operations. The Board will review nonbank subsidiaries of bank holding companies, and the other agencies will conduct similar reviews of nondepository institutions of thrift holding companies, independent mortgage lending companies, and mortgage brokers doing business with these entities. The reviews will include an evaluation of the companies' underwriting standards and senior-management oversight of the practices used for ensuring compliance with consumer protection regulations and laws. The agencies have been working closely together and are scheduled to begin the on-site reviews in the fourth quarter. The partner agencies will share information about the reviews and make joint assessments of lessons learned. This project should also lay the groundwork for various additional forms of future cooperation to ensure more effective and consistent supervision and consumer protection.

Legislative Responses Beyond the actions underway at the regulatory agencies, I am aware that the Congress is considering statutory changes to help alleviate the problem of foreclosures. Modernizing the programs administered by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) is one promising direction. The FHA has considerable experience in providing home financing for low- and moderate-income borrowers. It insures mortgages made to borrowers who meet certain underwriting criteria and who pay premiums into a reserve fund that is designated to cover the costs in the event of default. This insurance makes the loans less risky for lenders and investors, and it makes the loans eligible for securitization through the Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae).

Historically, the FHA has played an important role in the mortgage market, particularly for first-time home buyers. However, the FHA's share of first-lien home purchase loans declined substantially, from about 16 percent in 2000 to about 5 percent in 2006, as borrowers who might have sought FHA backing instead were attracted to nontraditional products with more-flexible and quicker underwriting and processing. In addition, maximum loan values that the FHA will insure have failed to keep pace with rising home values in many areas of the country.

In modernizing FHA programs, Congress might wish to be guided by design principles that allow flexibility and risk-based pricing. To alleviate foreclosures, the FHA could be encouraged to collaborate with the private sector to expedite the refinancing of creditworthy subprime borrowers facing large resets. Other changes could allow the agency more flexibility to design new products that improve affordability through features such as variable maturities or shared appreciation. In addition, creating risk-based FHA insurance premiums that match insurance premiums with borrowers' credit profiles would give more households access to refinancing options.

The risk of moral hazard must be considered in designing government-backed programs; such programs should not bail out failed investors, as doing so would only encourage excessive risk-taking. One must also consider adverse selection; programs that provide credit to only the weakest eligible borrowers are likely to be more costly than those that serve a broader risk spectrum. Risk-based insurance premiums or tighter screening and monitoring by lenders can mitigate adverse selection. But ultimately such mechanisms have their limits, and no government program will be able to provide meaningful help to the highest-risk borrowers without a public subsidy. Whether such subsidies should be employed is a decision for the Congress.

The government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are, to a limited extent, assisting in subprime refinancings and should be encouraged to provide products for subprime borrowers to the extent permitted by their charters. However, the GSE charters are likely to limit the ability of the GSEs to serve any but the most creditworthy subprime borrowers. Indeed, if GSE programs remove the strongest borrowers from the pool, the risks faced by other programs--such as a modernized FHA program--could be increased.

Some have suggested that the GSEs could help restore functioning in the secondary markets for non-conforming mortgages (specifically jumbo mortgages, those with principal value greater than $417,000) if the conforming-loan limits were raised. However, in my view, the reason that GSE securitizations are well-accepted in the secondary market is because they come with GSE-provided guarantees of financial performance, which market participants appear to treat as backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, even though this federal guarantee does not exist. Evidently, market participants believe that, in the event of the failure of a GSE, the government would have no alternative but to come to the rescue. The perception, however inaccurate, that the GSEs are fully government-backed implies that investors have few incentives in their role as counterparties or creditors to act to constrain GSE risk-taking. Raising the conforming-loan limit would expand this implied guarantee to another portion of the mortgage market, reducing market discipline further. If, despite these considerations, the Congress were inclined to move in this direction, it should assess whether such action could be taken in a way that is both explicitly temporary and able to be implemented sufficiently promptly to serve its intended purpose. Any benefits that might conceivably accrue to this action would likely be lost if implementation were significantly delayed, as private securitization activity would likely be inhibited in the interim.

Implications for Financial Markets and Monetary Policy Most recently, as I am sure Committee members are well aware, subprime mortgage losses that triggered uncertainty about structured products more generally have reverberated in broader financial markets, raising concern about the consequences for economic activity. As I noted in a speech last month at the economic symposium hosted by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, the turbulence originated in concerns about subprime mortgages, but the resulting global financial losses have far exceeded even the most pessimistic estimates of the credit losses on these loans. These wider losses reflect, in part, a significant increase in investor uncertainty centered on the difficulty of evaluating the risks for a wide range of structured securities products, which can be opaque or have complex payoffs. Investors also may have become less willing to assume risk. Some increase in premiums that investors require to take risk is probably a healthy development on the whole, as these premiums have been exceptionally low for some time. However, in this episode, the shift in risk attitudes combined with greater credit risk and uncertainty about how to value those risks has created significant market stress. On the positive side of the ledger, past efforts to strengthen capital positions and financial market infrastructure places the global financial system in a relatively strong position to work through this process.

In response to these developments, the Federal Reserve moved in early August to provide reserves to address unusual strains in money markets. On August 17, the Federal Reserve Board announced a cut in the discount rate of 50 basis points and adjustments to the Reserve Banks' usual discount window practices to facilitate the provision of term financing for as long as thirty days, renewable by the borrower. The purpose of the discount window actions was to assure depositories of the ready availability of a backstop source of liquidity. The Federal Reserve also took a number of supplemental actions, such as cutting the fee charged for lending Treasury securities.

Earlier this week, Federal Open Market Committee lowered its target for the federal funds rate by 50 basis points. The action was intended to help forestall some of the adverse effects on the broader economy that might arise from the disruptions in financial markets and to promote moderate growth over time. Recent developments in financial markets have increased the uncertainty surrounding the economic outlook. The Committee will continue to assess the effects of these and other developments on economic prospects and will act as needed to foster price stability and sustainable economic growth. "

In short, just another day in Traderdise. Look at the Chart above:  Dollar under 79 on the basket and coming down toward 0.70 Euro.  Go things!  Bye, bye, paper

 

AQ Video

Yet another video from al Qaeda - this one 80-minutes worth say reports.

 

Meteor Follow-up

While people in South America have been worried about the cause of more than 200 people getting ill after a meteor hit there over the weekend, the latest is that it was likely just gases from the impact.  There had been speculation it might have been a spy satellite coming down, but now seems not.

 

Around Here

The flooring disaster here at the ranch continues to unfold.  Turns out that yes, I did have one of those plastic pans installed, but it overflowed.  So today, we are playing the rest of "pick up the mess" as we discover just how far the water has permeated.  I have four sheets of plywood and the number of the flooring place at the ready, if that gives you a hint.
 

As a result, I am keeping today's report short - there's o much going on right now that working till late on the floor, the other demands on time, well, you got the idea. 

 


Wednesday September 19, 2007

Fed Move: Orchestrating the "Invisible Depression"

Several readers have asked me to give an analysis of the Fed action on Tuesday and explain what it means going forward.  You asked for it...

 

A couple of years back, I offered the idea to Peoplenomics subscribers that although the economy is likely to crash, there's might be one way to orchestrate a crash to make it 'disappear."  The "way" is to walk a perfect tightrope between a runaway deflation, such as the Weimar Republic experienced in the 1920's, and such as Zimbabwe (with  6,592% inflation) is presently in the midst of, on the one hand, while at the same time avoiding the pitfalls that come with a deflationary collapse -- like the one the US went through in the Great Depression of the early 1930's, and what was technically the Secondary Depression along about 1937-38 compounded by perverse economic policies of the time.

 

From a policy perspective, what this means in practical terms is that the Fed can not operate, and has not been operating, on an even-handed basis.  I just lost $1,200 in put options because the 'free market' is not being allowed to be 'free.'  Without massive Fed intervention/easing, the stock market would have declined and some of the rot would have been sorted out.

 

I must be a fool to believe in free markets!   Instead of letting the normal forces of free market capitalism cause deserved failures among the companies that over-leveraged, and especially the investment houses which made malinvestment during the real estate/house flipping bubble, the Fed instead threw open the discount window and is providing systemic liquidity like never before in order to keep the corporatist/globalist status quo alive.

 

Don't get me wrong, I'm not cheerleading a crash.  However, I do cheerlead for HONEST MONEY THAT HOLDS ITS VALUE OVER TIME.  That went missing in 1913 when the Fed seized America.

 

You'll notice, that the Fed wasn't pimping easy money when the markets were going up, but was only compelled to rig the table when there's a threat of it going down appeared.  Can you say asymmetric policy?  This has nothing to do with maintaining sound money - only maintaining the existing status quo of ever-increasing corpgov exploitation of humans.  More work, always more work Citizen, for what foreclosed homeowners experience as a declining lifestyle.

 

Recently, I showed you a 'precrash' chart, showing the danger zone where past markets have dropped precipitously about 55 days after a major peak  Today, with a close above my "line of death" brought about by the unexpectedly large Fed cut, you can see that the economic Valley of Death seems likely to be traversed - and it will only take a close over 1,522 on the S&P 3-4 days running to turn me into a wild bull on equities. If I were so foolish...

 

.

 

Free Lunch?

While the Fed's policy sounds superficially reasonable, and it could be argued that it will bail out homeowners who are already seeing their homes repossessed in record numbers, the real beneficiaries of the cut will be financial institutions. 

 

The Fed knows full well that had the free market been allowed to prevail, the market would have collapsed, just as it did in 1929.  What we would have surrounding us would be failed pension plans that were hip-deep in equities and liar's paper, there would be wiped out pensions, even more massive declines in home ownership, the whole gamut of bad juju for the economy.

 

All of which would be marvelous, if it were to arrive at no cost.  Unfortunately, it doesn't.  The not very well hidden cost is the quality of life in America continues to decline because of incipient inflation, which though masked from public view by and ostensibly stable economy, the corrosion at the core continues. 

 

Don't forget, the unemployed are only counted so long as their receive benefits.  And the substitution of hamburger for steaks in food prices (and other hedonic nonsense) is well-established economic practice.  They're both meat, right?  And to compare apples with apples, well, that'd ruin the status quo.

 

To see through the veil of offishuldumb, you need to start watching the economic indicators that always matter (commodities) when the economy transitions from 'nearly crashing' to 'crack up boom.' which gets us back to this morning.

 

Specifically, I expect commodity prices to jump, and two in particular to watch are gold and oil.  Now, get a pencil and let's play Tracking Incipient Inflation - the home version.

 

We start with a simple observation: 24-hours ago, the price of gold was $715.  This morning, as I pencil out the math, the price of gold is $723.  (These numbers won't be exact, because they will bounce around with trading noise.)  Just notice the numbers.  Gold's up about $8.

 

Next, we look at the Dow which gained 2.51% yesterday.

 

Could it be that the percentage gain in stocks is about equal to the percentage gain in gold (and maybe oil, too, although noisy and trading dampened a bit) as money just got easier/more plentiful?

 

$715 gold, before the Fed cut) times a 1.025 gain would place gold at $732.875.  My conclusion?  Gold should be strong as it plays 'catch up' to the upward repricing of equities, driven by more easy money. The 'yellow dog' has already hit $726.90 today, according to Kitco.  Hmmm... 1.6% right there.

 

If my theory holds water, we should read headlines about the price of oil going to new records, too.   Whoops!  Hold the phone!  "Oil prices rise above US$82 a barrel on US Fed rate cut, tight crude, gasoline supplies..."

 

The good news is that if you have a 401-K plan, while the paper (notional) value of the retirement fund may remain stable, or even increase, when I look at the incipient inflation, what I see is an M-3 rate approaching 15%, as shown over at trader Bart's site: http://www.nowandfutures.com/key_stats.html   The Fed, of course, hid the M-3 (digidollars/easy money report) from sight about a year and a half back, knowing what was coming.  No real sound reason, just the magicians saying, in effect, "Not going to let you look up that sleeve."  Fine, be that way.

 

If the Fed can get enough money pumped into the economy, there's speculation that it will help the hard-hit real estate market.

 

Hiding A Lifestyle Crash

A read of history suggests that in an economic depression, in addition to the simple 'money displacements' which can go hyperinflationary (Weimar) or massively deflationary (USA 1930), the real cost on humans on either track was a downgrade of lifestyles.  Those periods were called "Hard Times" with good reason.

 

So as we fast-forward to the next couple of months, what we have to be asking is something like this:  "If there is economic displacement/shenanigans/malinvestment at the same levels as recorded in earlier episodic economic readjustments, what would it 'feel like' or how would it 'manifest in daily life' if there was neither overt inflation or deflation?"

 

Lifestyle would likely decline.  The costs of goods at the store would go through the roof, but the purchasing power of consumers slowly ratchet down.

 

Because the problem of bankers is now global, namely how do they get their 'interest', the Fed move is sparking a global rally in stocks and paper assets - the bankers at the international level have opted for global systemic inflation sufficient to maintain the illusion of 'growth' while papering over with official statistics the fact that we're working ever harder to maintain lifestyle.

 

You are going to drive a small car, live in a smaller house, and so forth because from a financial and resource standpoint, the world can't afford the big ones any more.  Same thing with highways.  The government is selling off highways you have already paid for to pad the state government pockets which is why nationally we're in this new tool-road frenzy.  Restrictions on travel, indeed.

 

Not that any of this should come as a surprise, because the whole method of the banker-class/uber classen/.Powers That Be, is to loan money - push debt on working class, then in order to be paid 'interest', they simply print up more money (so they can get a free lunch) and in return, the purchasing power of the dollars in working class hands declines.

 

"But it's not a free lunch, when bankers have to face Risk!" you might counter. "Shouldn't they get some compensation for Risk?"  Where's the Risk when the Fed bails everyone out, or behind the scene insiders help rig buyouts?  Sorry, I'm not biting.

 

The bottom line is this:  You may continue to show a 'paper gain' on investments, but on a purchasing power basis, the top was in in 2000 and what appears before you now is the Fed's best efforts to walk the line between a deflationary collapse and a hyperinflationary collapse.  They may be able to pull it off, too.  But your purchasing power will suffer - and your quality of life seems likely to continue to fall as what's now only 4.8-cents of purchasing power of the original pre-Fed US dollar is set up to be hollowed out again!

 

You also need to temper your view of bankers when you read things like Alan Greenspan's book:  By the Federal Reserve's own calculator, what cost $100 when Greenspan took over at the Fed was pushing $180 when he left.  Greenspan presided over roughly halving the purchasing power of the dollar.  I think that's an all-time record for any Fed Chair.  A better book title might have been "I halved the Dollar!"

 

And you wonder why I call them Banksters?

 

My commodity broker (JB) called this morning to congratulate me on my buying of March '08 corn options a week or two back.  "Yes, the Fed has almost insured I will make money on those," I admitted.  Same with my gold and silver calls, it seems. Oh well. I guess the way to play in this casino is to bet with the House.

 

Email of the Day

So just as I write the explanation why banksters are back-slapping and jovial, and the malinvestment guys get bonuses because they got bailed out, a perplexed reader wants to know "Where's the good news in all this?"

"George, I read your column daily trying to learn about the world of finance. I may sound dumb, but I just don't understand why the stock market took off yesterday or how the fed action will help me and my family.

 

We are a two income, middle class family with two children living in a city of 60,000 people in the greater Baltimore/DC metro area. The state of MD is planning on raising the sales tax from 5% to 6%. I have never complained about my property and state/local income taxes, because although they are high, we have excellent public schools. Private schools (junior and high school) would be $14,000 per year and up per kid. So now the fed has lowered rates, which to my understanding means commodity prices will go up. That means my county schools will take a big hit on their energy costs to bus and heat/cool the buildings.

 

My church, which generously supports local homeless and single mothers, will have dramatically higher energy costs. People attending our church will have less to give. Who will pick up that slack? Where I really expect to be hit, in addition to energy costs, is at the grocery store. Where can I make cuts in my spending to make up for the higher costs I will face?

 

We already drive a Prius, keep our heat at 60 degrees most of the time (65 when we are home), no longer use a clothes dryer (everything is air dried), only eat out 2 meals a month, and have a vegetable garden/fruit trees/bushes in our yard. I only see the fed's actions raising my daily costs and taxes will have to go up. So, why is everyone so happy about this fed action?"

Scroll back up to the part about how we get to have an "invisible crash" and your lifestyle gets squashed by the Powers That Be.  This is what 'squished' feels like.  Get used to it.  Vote out all incumbents in 2008.

 

Pension Grab

Here's a really good story to read if you're looking for insight into the generosity that dwells deep in the corporate heart of America: "American Home Tries to Seize Employees' Retirement funds."   OK, so there's a generosity shortage...Hey!  Maybe we can monetize that!  A couple of tranches of Triple A Generosity...yeah!  I gotta buy some of that.

 

Languages Disappearing

Native languages around the world are dying out at unprecedented rates says a new study.

 

Energies from Space

Hundreds ill from a meteor crash in Peru?  Sure sounds like that linguistic 'energies from space" stuff.

---

Linguistically, the Fed meeting seems to have been the capper on the 'emotional release' period.  So now we transition to building emotional tensions.  While I don't see anything really big yet (I mean other than a guarantee of commodity inflation as I read it) I'm scanning the headlines for hints.

 

New War Chants

"Neo-cons have Syria in their sights" says an Asia Times headline.

---

Israel has Gaza in its sights.

 

Oil Holds

Didn't I just tell you oil went above $82 and seems to be holding there?

 

In Hot Water

I'm taking the day off client consulting to replace a leaking water heater, which managed to drain onto the flooring and which means I now not only get to put in a water heater, but also peel back flooring and replace subfloor, too.  (My, don't we know how to have fun?)

 

Two highlights out of the trip to the Big Box store to get the water heater.  One was a knowledgeable fellow in appliances who said "Thank you for not calling it a hot water heater..."  You mean because that would be redundant?  I then left him ponder "So, what does it mean when someone says to turn the air conditioning down?"

 

The other thing:  Christmas goods are coming out.  Am I the only guy who thinks holidays are no longer holidays?  I might start a campaign to require listings of "2008 Commercial Events" instead of "2008 Holidays."  Truth in labeling kinda thing.

 


Tuesday, September 18, 2007

Update: Fed Goes 50 + 50 - But, Is it Good?

The Federal Reserve in a bit of a surprise today tacitly admitted that the economy was going softer, faster, than they had expected and so they have lowered the Fed Funds rate 50-basis points (1/2%) and matched that with a discount rate move of 50 BP's - or 1/2%.  Here's the statement:

"Release Date: September 18, 2007

For immediate release

The Federal Open Market Committee decided today to lower its target for the federal funds rate 50 basis points to 4-3/4 percent.

Economic growth was moderate during the first half of the year, but the tightening of credit conditions has the potential to intensify the housing correction and to restrain economic growth more generally. Today’s action is intended to help forestall some of the adverse effects on the broader economy that might otherwise arise from the disruptions in financial markets and to promote moderate growth over time.

Readings on core inflation have improved modestly this year. However, the Committee judges that some inflation risks remain, and it will continue to monitor inflation developments carefully.

Developments in financial markets since the Committee’s last regular meeting have increased the uncertainty surrounding the economic outlook. The Committee will continue to assess the effects of these and other developments on economic prospects and will act as needed to foster price stability and sustainable economic growth.

Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman; Timothy F. Geithner, Vice Chairman; Charles L. Evans; Thomas M. Hoenig; Donald L. Kohn; Randall S. Kroszner; Frederic S. Mishkin; William Poole; Eric Rosengren; and Kevin M. Warsh.

In a related action, the Board of Governors unanimously approved a 50-basis-point decrease in the discount rate to 5-1/4 percent. In taking this action, the Board approved the requests submitted by the Boards of Directors of the Federal Reserve Banks of Boston, New York, Cleveland, St. Louis, Minneapolis, Kansas City, and San Francisco.

While the stocks have bounded upwards on the news, it is clearly not an instant solution to the world's economic problems.  The British today were forced to guarantee the deposits of all depositors as the headlines today have gone to the note that "British bank under siege as savers bale out."

 

While we might see a short-term pop in the stocks today, there's a terrible message to foreign banks holding US paper assets - they're not going to pay as much.  Now, what follows is that if they don't pay as much, they are not worth as much, although that chicken won't likely be coming home to roost until today.

 

For the balance of today, we might see a temporary love-fest, but the Fed continues to worry about inflation and around here, we're wondering how soon someone wakes up to the idea that by making investing in US debt instruments less appealing, what we are really doing is forcing a devaluation of the dollar in terms of international goods and services.

 

So, yes, the Fed can cut, but that kills the Dollar overseas (which means import prices will now rise and that will come along as inflation) or, we could have held rates, preserved the value (purchasing power of the dollar).  To me, this is as close to assuring an increase in grains (which I hold) previous metals (which I hold) and all non-paper assets.

 

It's not like I'm the only guy holding this view - go check out what Dr. Marc Faber told Bloomberg before the cut...

 

Producer Prices Drop

The Labor Department is out with the latest issue of "rearview economics" today in the form of the Producer Price Index.  But what's this?  A surprising DROP in the PPI?  Can you say the words INCIPIENT DEFLATION?

The Producer Price Index for Finished Goods fell 1.4 percent in August, seasonally adjusted, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. This decrease followed a 0.6-percent increase in July and a 0.2-percent decline in June. At the earlier stages of processing, prices received by manufacturers of intermediate goods moved down 1.2 percent in August compared with a 0.6-percent advance in July, and the crude goods index dropped 3.0 percent after climbing 1.2 percent in the prior month. (See table A.)

Finished goods were up 2.2% year-on-year unadjusted, but intermediate goods were down 1.2% and crude goods were down 3%

 

The 'big dog' in the numbers is energy, which dropped 6.6%, but that's not likely to hold because oil is continuing to climb now...but on the news,  maybe gold will slow its rise a bit. Or will it?  When the Fed drops today, that will be long-term inflationary...

 

Ups and Downs

Oil today is trading near record levels.  You might want to spin up some trance tunz and ponder whether this is because the purchasing power of the buck is tanking (a tasteless pun, but meaning more paper for the same amount of oil) OR whether it's because there's really no increase in production, despite the increase in demand, regardless of the OPEC hype last week promising another x barrels a day...

 

At 247wallst.com there's a post asking whether $200 oil is in sight.

 

Fed Day

Let's update the Pre-crash trajectory chart, which is holding right above the declining trend line.  While media hints the Fed will cut, they are in a terrible spot...

 

 

Bank Runs

"Oh, those." We read the headlines out of Europe this morning and spy headlines like "Spread of banking panic forces ministers to guarantee savings" and "Fears rise over online banking problems", plus "Will the bank runs stop?"

 

Peoplenomics subscribers are reminded to reread issue 307 (August 26, 2007) for a more complete discussion of bank runs  which is bound to spur some personal contingency thinking.

 

Ammo Runs Going Mainstream

From our "Told you so!" department, there's an AP story this morning about "Ammunition Costs more; some calibers are scarce" and right there on the St. Louis Post Dispatch website.  I've been warning you this was coming for how long?  What?  Did I hear you say March 2006?  (scroll down to Ammo and MRE's, and further down to "Encounters with scarcity" on March 22.)

 

My point is, better to duck, or stock up, 18 months early than one minute too late.

 

Reality/Realty Smack

While it's a foregone conclusion that the Fed will lower rates (and pump a little inflation into the system) later today, the Big Ugly of the morning is the August Foreclosure report from RealtyTrac.  Foreclosures are up 115% year-on-year for August, goes the report.

 

Not to be outdone, the Houston Chronicle says the month-to-month change in foreclosures is up 36% from July to August.   Do you remember who the office-holders and appointees were, touting the 'highest levels of home ownership in history' just a year or so back?

 

Even if you manage to hang onto your home, a couple of key things for you to watch for:  First, you will want to keep an eye on the Google News search for "property tax" stories.  Secondly, you'll want to watch the mail like a hawk and get amped up to appeal your property tax revaluation notice next time it comes in.

 

You'll feel the second screw will be turned when, despite falling property prices, local governments try to hold on to inflation puffed-up property prices and thus be able to levy higher taxes.  Trust me on this - it's coming and in some areas it has already arrived.

 

Another Guy Who "Gets It"

I couldn't help but notice the fine job Bloomberg TV did this morning interviewing commodity legend Jim Rogers.  In effect, Rogers said that while the Fed may cut later today, it will be really inflationary - and for that reason you might want to consider foreign currencies, especially the Asian ones.

 

What's more, he made comments to the effect that the subprime people were busy a year or two back telling everyone how smart they were as they were cashing their $10-million and up bonus checks.  Yet today, without paying anything back, there's an expectation that these people ought to be bailed out.  Asks Rogers on Bloomberg, "Is that what the Fed's about?  Or for that matter, is that what a just society is about?"

 

Sheesh!  Sounds like something you read...er...here.

 

Rogers meantime says he's ready to bail out of Shanghai if that market doubles by February.

 

Equal Opportunity Tasing

Presidential hopeful Tom Tancredo is asking the US Office of Detention and Removal operations why a U.S. citizen can be zapped with a taser by the Feds, but a Mexican or other illegal immigrant can't be.   And you're wondering why I hold that you, me, and other American have had our rights systematically hijacked by ne'er-do-wells inside the beltway.

 

Question Kerry - Get Tased

Here's a video - which would not be out of place in ...er...a middle Teutonic European country before WWII...

 

Turn Date

It's not supposed to be an event like 9/11, but I'm really expecting some world changing event, or sequence of events between about noon today (Texas time) and noon tomorrow (ibid) based on what the time monks up at www.halfpasthuman.com have been working on.  They've narrowed it down to what seems like about a 47-minute window, late this evening (US EDT) / early morning hours east of Europe.

---
Cliff and Igor are playing this one pretty close to the vest, in a way.  "The kind of thing you don't want to know about in advance," I was warned.

---

Monkey mind, of course races:  If what's expected were in terra (like pending earthquake #3 in the 8+ range) they wouldn't have a problem telling what it is, nor, if it was part of energies from space, for example, nothing particularly dangerous about a little foreknowledge there; but this is something else.

 

Needless to say, I will check just before bed, and likely wake up in the middle of the night, to see if CNN has added some new crawler about 'xxxxx' breaking. 

 

In the meantime, to amuse myself, I've taken to clicking the 'random' link on the www.urbandictionary.com site to broaden my personal linguistic base.  Seems this is one of the lexical sources where new/changing words and their meanings are sniffed out to seed the web scanning.

 

I'm particularly pleased with today's Urban Dictionary (no relation) word for the day: Conswervative which is "A conservative politician or other public figure caught doing things that he has denounced on the record."  Hell, that suit seems to fit most of the folks inside the beltway and wallet.  Those'd be the Capital Hill (intentionally spelled correctly) Errorists. 

 

Anyone for an Errorist Alert System?  Natürlich, I mean naturally, the highest danger level for such an alert system would be 'green' as the errorists can't be trusted with money, right?

 

"New War"

Beat them drums!  Let's see who lines up where: "Russian foreign minister worried about Iran 'war plans'.  Hmmm...  "China opposes threats against Iran, says opposed to threats of force.

 

Yes,. the "Western talk of Iran war premature "hype": IAEA head"

 

But, is the Western military-industrial complex (don't blame me, that's Eisenhower's term for it) going to wait?  "Move troops to Iran border, Brown told" by General David Petraeus.

 

War tonight, anyone?  I figure it's just a matter of time till we wake up to that headline. You know why Gwynne Dyer's book about the ME was titled "The Mess They Made", right?  An even bigger one is possible - if you can wrap your head around that...

 

Email of the Day

From a reader:

"More grist for the Amero mill - TPTB ain't going to let Americans pay off their debts with coming hyper inflated dollars - now either there are 'inflation adjustment clauses' in nearly every kind of debt (CCs, fixed mortgages, car loans, etc.) ... or TPTB will use the Amero to reset the payment. How is all this going to work out? Like Zimbabwe, or a Thirder Way?"

Go read up "Argentina - Caserolazo"

 

"Hi, Edenhope"

I get critical email (surprisingly often) from people who think I'm wrong on many points (I am) and who call me a 'doomster' which I am not.  I'm just one of a growing number of people who are seeing through the veil / hypnosis of the mediafog and see there's a lot more important work to be done on this planet than making bullets, collecting 'special' piles of paper, and power-tripping.

 

All those things stay here (on planet) when you die, along with Ego.  So, what's really important is the work of collecting the best possible memories, getting the inner work done, and contributing something to people around you, all the while living in a world possessed by an acquisitory madness of ego run amok.

 

For a change of pace, check out the Edenhope Project "Recreating hope at the edge of civilization."

 

There, all better now.  I'll go feed Dick Chinney and the other goats; have fun on the freeway.

 


Monday September 17, 2007

Fighting Words from Greenspan?

I don't normally start off my reports with a plug for other media, but I understand that Alan Greenspan will be on the Today Show on NBC this morning talking about his book, which to my way of thinking, is an explosive problem for the republicorp Powers That Be and a gift to democorps and the global bankers.

 

Let me explain why.  First, Greenspan said that despite all the hype, the Iraq was really is about oil.  Then he says, in looking forward to 2030 that double-digit inflation is likely before we get there (this as a time when the Fed is meeting in Jackson hole and due out with an interest rate decision tomorrow which is the toughest test for the republicorp and Ben Bernanke yet as the dollar slide is underway).

 

Then Greenspan goes out and tells the German news magazine Stern that the Euro may replace the US Dollar as the world's reserve currency!  Holy smokes, this is getting to be a HUGE confessional.

 

Worse, Greenspan is telling British (but it might as well be American, too) homeowners to brace for much higher home rates and issues something, which is I read the reports right, is almost akin to an apology to homeowners for his role in it.

 

Now comes the point of this morning's report:  IF you believe that there are various factions within the Powers that Be - and IF you believe that public statements are how these factions communicate with one another THEN the question is what will be the response of what I'd call the injured party (the oil-fired republicorp)? 

 

Clearly, Greenspan himself is going high enough profile with his tell-all book that a direct 'payback' would be too obvious, but as I sit down with the first cup this morning, my reaction to the story is that Greenspan has issued 'fighting words" and republicorp doctors might want to double up on meds for high blood pressure. 

 

Is Greenspan suddenly a 'runaway cannon' telling truth to all who will listen?  Or, is this a prequel to something even larger in the way of a 'message'?

 

My second thought is more of a tactical question, really: "Greenspan has gotten in a serious first punch, against one of the factions.  Is there a follow-on punch to follow, or will the 'injured faction' strike back? 

 

Greenspan's sudden bout of truth-telling on oil, housing, and interest rates (which seems to square with the economic context offered here, on many scores) has set in motion a major shift.  Is this the beginning of the turn that was predicted linguistically by Cliff and Igor of  www.halfpasthuman.com  for the 18th/19th?  Sure seems to qualify... Telling the truth is sometimes a revolutionary act. 

 

Is a high enough media profile and a 'tells all' book functionally equivalent to an insurance policy?

---

In my view, short of an oil embargo, is that the Greenspan story may be the biggest economic event of the year.  Oh sure, the slide of the dollar is interesting, and so is the blow-up of the subprime market.  But, in terms of getting down to causes and factions, Greenspan takes the cake.

---

This is a dandy day to see how your news and information filters are working, too.  If your favorite media is leading with the "OJ Arrested, No Bail" story, or you're swallowing the latest ladle of political stew about presidential wannbe politics first ("Clinton to offer health care plan" seems to echo forever, doesn't it?), then consider your reality filters set to 'denial/don't want to really know what's going on'.

---

Not the lead story in LameStreamMedia, but "Britons withdraw Billions in Bank Run" should scare the hell out of you, too.  I've been warning that this kind of thing would happen around the start of the Greater Depression, but seems many folks just don't want to believe their 'own lying eyes.'  Fine...

 

We can't have hedge funds blowing up, bank runs, the dollar caving in, and someone running around telling the truth, shouting the equivalent of "The theater is on fire!" without expecting something explosive.  Soon come?  To crawlers near you - by Wednesday morning, maybe.

 

Blackwater Backpedal

"Blackwater security firm banned from Iraq" headlines a report.  Apparently, their license to operate was revoked by Iraq's Interior Ministry.  I wouldn't want to be his insurance agent about now.  There are about 1.2 'contractors' for each 'official solider' in Iraq at the moment, say sources.

 

Good thing we're just there to install democracy, huh?  Shhh!  Quiet Alan.

 

New AG

Retired federal judge Michael Mukasey has been picked by George Bush to be his (dare I say 'our'?)  Attorney General.  While his judicial record seems good, his alliance with Rudy Giuliani's WH campaign is worrisome, in that as John Dean mentions in his book "Broken Government" if you like strongman government, Giuliani is another step past Bush in terms of strong federal powers (diminution of individual rights).  So, let me ask, what would you suppose the leanings of Rudy's judicial guy would be?

 

Hey!  Who needs FISA Courts anyway, right?  We  really need to rewrite Napoleonic justice to republicorp justice.  How about Gitmo plays Devil's Island?

 

War Selling - Get Fear

Oh, those "bomb Iran" drums are beating louder and louder.  Sure, the factions are messaging back and forth in public, but that's not going to derail the next war expansion program.  Gotta fight terror worldwide - it's our manifest destiny, ain't it?  Besides, everyone who disagrees with us is a terrorist, right?  Therefore, if you're not with us, you're against us!  (Whew! Did someone put something in my coffee?)

 

Today's 'selling points' are French media: "World should brace for possible war over Iran: France" and "Pentagon develops list of 2,000 bombing targets in Iran."  Sounds to me like there aren't that many nuclear sites in the US, let alone Iran, so clearly, this will be designed to hurt more people and break more things than nuclear capability alone...

 

Around the Ranch

A short report this morning - too much going on around the ranch.  The new (registered Boer) goats are getting used to our schedule.  The well bearded male has been named Dick Chinney, although Ben Baahnanke was in the running.  One of the does may be named Cloven Leechman...the other Marilynn Mungoat.  First newborn male goat will be named Igor, we've decided.

 

Before I venture out to pound more fence post, I will set up a couple of new subscribers to Peoplenomics - got behind due to ranch work this weekend. Sore all over.

 


 

News from Elliott Wave International

 

Google
The Web
UrbanSurvival Only

Chart of the Week!

 

 

Write when you get rich,

 

George Ure, The People's Economist

 

 

 

Publisher's Notes

Free Financial News updated daily except Sundays.  UrbanSurvival.com is mirrored at www.independencejournal.com

·        Bulletins are posted as our work schedule permits and as events warrant. 

·        We try to publish Monday-Saturday by 8 AM Central Time/ 9 AM Eastern with 7:55 Central pretty normal.  If you're easily offended by the occasional typo, then check about 8:15 Central - we usually proofread and spell-check after the first post.  We've had some amusing typos in the past...

·        Financial and news judgments of the publisher are not to be considered "advice"

·        Please read and understand our disclaimer

·        All original content (C) 2007 by George A. Ure, except other authors as noted

·        Copyright of all linked articles is cited under fair use and all rights remain with linked sites

Our premium service, which contains more in depth reports is available on a $40/year subscription basis.  Details at www.peoplenomics.com/subscribe.htm.

 

The "web bot project" indicates a reference to the time predictive technology embodied in  "Asymmetric Language Trend Analysis Intelligence Reports" pioneered and operated by Tenax Software Engineering for www.halfpasthuman.com.  Extracts, when used, are with exclusive permission and any references on other web sites must contain a link to both this site and HalfPastHuman's main page: www.halfpasthuman.com.

 

Site Contact: george@ure.net  

  
This site is formatted for viewing at 1024 X 768, Firefox or MSIE 6.0 or later and a current version of the free Adobe Acrobat reader for certain linked articles, available free from Adobe.com at URL: http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html

---

© 2007 Copyright Notice: The author(s) of this site requires that any links or use of  material from this site include the author's name and a link to this site. All links included in our source material must also be included in citations.  Address questions to: george@ure.net.  Copyright infringers will be pursued, and please note that Fair Use requires identification of the author name and we require a link - which when you think about it is really minimal recognition of our works.